Gastrin, Anti-helicobacter Pylori and Pepsinogen Diagnostic Accuracy Study
NCT ID: NCT07060482
Last Updated: 2025-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
240 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-08-01
2026-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, a camera test is needed to identify inflammation in the stomach. The method being tested in this study may be able to do this using just a pinprick of blood.
If this test proves to be good at diagnosing inflammation in the stomach with just a pinprick of blood, it may be used in the future to decide who actually needs to have a full camera test done or not. This could really improve the waiting lists for these camera tests in the future. It may also mean that we can identify problems at an earlier stage.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Usefulness of Serum Pepsinogen and Gastrin as the Predictive Biomarker of Atrophic Gastritis, Intestinal Metaplasia and Gastric Cancer in Korea
NCT02184910
Gastropanel for Gastric Atrophy and Cancer Risk Assessment
NCT02114411
Diagnosis of Gastric Precancerous Lesions by a Blood Test GastroPanel in Patients With Increased Gastric Cancer Risk
NCT02624271
Comparison of Different Helicobacter Pylori Detection Methods in Patients With Chronic Atrophic Gastritis
NCT04923113
Helicobacter Pylori Screening and Treatment in the At-risk South Florida Community-AIM 2
NCT07224048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The precise risk of progression to GC in those with GA is poorly understood, particularly in lower-risk Western countries such as Ireland. In higher-risk countries such as Japan and South Korea, the reported risk may be as high as 0.1 to 0.3% per year. This is similar to the rates of malignant progression seen in low-risk colorectal adenomas and the risk seen in non-dysplastic Barrett's. This has prompted increased interest in the concept of surveilling patients with GA in the hopes of earlier identification of GC. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that if Helicobacter Pylori is eradicated in patients with GA, the Correa cascade can be halted, and the risk of developing GC can be greatly reduced.
The British Society of Gastroenterology addressed this issue in their guideline document published in 2019. The guideline addresses several issues concerning managing patients at risk of developing Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Central to this is the concept of managing patients with GA. The guideline advocates for increased endoscopist awareness of the macroscopic features of the atrophic stomach. When recognised, the endoscopist should then take targeted biopsies as per the Updated Sydney System. This biopsy regimen involves taking Biopsies from the antrum, both lesser and greater curvature, the incisura and the gastric body again, both lesser and greater curvature. These biopsies should be sent to the lab in separately labelled specimen jars. The histological assessment should then be conducted using the Operative link for Gastritis assessment system, also known as the OLGA system. This classifies the severity of GA into 4 subtypes. There is evidence to suggest that patients with OLGA stage 3 or 4 GA should enter a 3-yearly surveillance program. This pathway is well established and in practice.
The issue currently, however, remains identifying patients with GA. With ever-increasing waiting lists for endoscopic procedures and growing numbers of dyspeptic patients, there is a need to triage referrals to increase the diagnostic yield from oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). The use of Biomarkers to identify patients at risk of GA is one such potential pathway.
A panel of biomarkers (commercially available as the GastroPanel), including pepsinogen 1, pepsinogen 2, Gastrin 17, and IgG antibodies to Helicobacter pylori, has been shown to predict GA in high-risk regions. However, their efficacy in identifying GA in lower-risk Western cohorts of patients is less well known. This combination of biomarkers is instructive of the morphological state of the gastric mucosa. Pepsinogen 1 is produced predominantly by the chief cells of the oxyntic mucosa of the corpus and fundus of the stomach. Pepsinogen 2 is similarly produced by the chief cells but also by neck mucous cells, which are found in the oxyntic mucosa and the pyloric mucosa of the antrum and pyloric canal. Thus, in the setting of GA of the oxyntic mucosa, pepsinogen 1 levels will decrease to a greater extent than pepsinogen 2 levels. Gastrin 17 is a peptide produced by the G cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system located in the pyloric mucosa of the antrum and pyloric canal. Decreased levels of Gastrin 17 are seen in the setting of GA of the pylorus. Thus, by evaluating the levels of these biomarkers, it may be possible to predict both the presence and topological extent of GA.
An assessment of these biomarker levels, in concert with the patient's clinical history, including symptoms and risk factors, could then be used to triage OGD waiting lists. Patients with biomarker levels suggestive of GA may then be prioritised for an OGD.
Previous testing algorithms for these biomarkers involved the drawing of a serum sample and then assessment of the biomarker levels via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. This may have limited application in the clinical setting, given the lab space and experience needed to conduct this test. However, recent improvements in point-of-care testing technology, including the development of an immunological lateral flow testing method for these biomarkers (GastroPanel QuickTest), raise the possibility of a useable clinic-based test. The most recent iteration of this device is based on the acquisition of a pinprick of whole blood from the patient's finger. This is similar in practice to the testing method of blood sugar levels, which is routinely done prior to various tests, including OGDs.
We intend to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this test against the gold standard of endoscopically obtained gastric mucosa biopsies in patients presenting for OGDs in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Patients will be prospectively identified and invited to participate in the study following informed consent. When they arrive for their OGD, a pinprick of whole blood will be obtained prior to their OGD. The immunological lateral flow testing machine is portable and will be in the Endoscopy room. The test will be run while the patient has their OGD as planned. Routine biopsies from the oxyntic and pyloric mucosa will be obtained. The lateral flow test results will then be compared to the histological results of the biopsies to assess the diagnostic accuracy of both the biomarkers and the lateral flow testing method.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients presenting for routine diagnostic gastroscopy.
Patients presenting for routine diagnostic gastroscopy.
Panel of biomarkers including Gastrin 17, pepsinogen 1 and 2, and anti-helicobacter pylori antibodies.
This study will be assessing the diagnostic accuracy of this panel of biomarkers for diagnosing gastric atrophy in the Irish population for the first time. This reflects the assessment of these biomarkers in diagnosing gastric atrophy in a low-risk Western population.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Panel of biomarkers including Gastrin 17, pepsinogen 1 and 2, and anti-helicobacter pylori antibodies.
This study will be assessing the diagnostic accuracy of this panel of biomarkers for diagnosing gastric atrophy in the Irish population for the first time. This reflects the assessment of these biomarkers in diagnosing gastric atrophy in a low-risk Western population.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eoghan Burke
Specialist Registrar in Oesophagogastric Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eoghan Burke, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal college of Surgeons in Ireland
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-248
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.