The Selection Criteria for the Second-look Endoscopy Among Patients With Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT02197039

Last Updated: 2022-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

316 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this prospective study is to identify risk factors which could predict poor fading of SRH or early recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcer hemorrhage after successful endoscopic hemostasis and high-dose PPI infusion. These risk factors will be the selection criteria for patients who are indicated to receive second-look endoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common disease, and recurrent bleeding is an independent risk factor leading to mortality. The appearance of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) indicates possible recurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding, for which the likelihood decreases over the course of 3-6 days. In addition to endoscopic evidences illustrating the SRH, patients with co-morbidities have a higher risk of recurrent bleeding.

Patients with co-morbidities have not only higher recurrent bleeding rates during the first 3 days but also higher delay recurrent bleeding after 3-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion than those without. More than 50% recurrent bleeding develops after 3-day PPI infusion among patients with end stage renal diseases. Although endoscopic treatment plus a 72-hour intravenous PPI infusion and followed by oral PPI has already been adopted as a standard treatment in peptic ulcer bleeding currently, several studies showed limited effectiveness of such treatment for high risk patients. The reasons may be because lesions of SRH were not completely faded after initial treatment including endoscopic hemostasis and intravenous PPI infusion. Thus, it is an important issue to improve such high recurrent bleeding risk for these patients.

Endoscopic treatment plus a 72-hour intravenous PPI infusion is the standard protocol for treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. Moreover, several studies have shown that PPI treatment could decrease the presentation of SRH. However, there were insufficient data to validate the efficacy of such standard treatment to fade the SRH, especially among high risk patients. Therefore, several studies looked at the efficacy of routine second-look endoscopy, defined as scheduled repeat endoscopy after primary endoscopic hemostasis in patients at high risk of rebleeding. However, the role and the selection criteria for patients who require second-look endoscopy remains uncertain. There is a pressing need to elucidate the role of second-look endoscopy in these patients.

Hence, the purpose of this prospective study is to identify risk factors which could predict poor fading of SRH or early recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcer hemorrhage after successful endoscopic hemostasis and high-dose PPI infusion. This data will show the originality and clinical importance to identify the selection criteria for patients who are indicated to receive second-look endoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The High risk group

Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole or pantoprazole immediately after successful endoscopic hemostasis. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole or pantoprazole infusion.

Patients are defined in the high risk group if they still have major stigmata of recent hemorrhage at the second-look endoscopy or have early recurrent bleeding before the schedule time for follow-up.

Recurrent bleeding is defined as: 1) continuous melena, hematochezia, or the presence of recurrent bloody aspirates through a nasogastric tube and 2) relapse of hemodynamic instability, including systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, heart rate \>120 beats per minute, or a drop in hemoglobin concentration by more than 2 g/dL.

esomeprazole or pantoprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca AB, Södertälje, Sweden) immediately after hemostasis is achieved spontaneously or by gastroscopy. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole infusion. Because of concern for patient safety with certain drug-drug interactions, patients who take clopidogrel receive intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc®, Takeda, Singen, Germany), including an 80 mg loading dose and a 3-day continuous high-dose (8 mg/h) of infusion.

Endoscopic hemostasis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At the index gastroscopy, bleeding ulcers are checked. If the adherent clot is found over the ulcer base, it will be vigorously washed away with water jet. All of the stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) are treated by one or a combination of endoscopic therapies including local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000, bipolar heated probe at 20 J per goal consecutively until achievement of coaptive coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy. The success of endoscopic hemostasis is defined as cessation of bleeding together with achievement of cavitation at the vessel after application of the heater probe.

The control group

Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole or pantoprazole immediately after successful endoscopic hemostasis. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole or pantoprazole infusion.

Patients are defined in the control group if they does not have recurrent bleeding before the schedule time for follow-up, and have only minor stigmata of hemorrhage or clean ulcer base at the second-look endoscopy.

Recurrent bleeding is defined as: 1) continuous melena, hematochezia, or the presence of recurrent bloody aspirates through a nasogastric tube and 2) relapse of hemodynamic instability, including systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, heart rate \>120 beats per minute, or a drop in hemoglobin concentration by more than 2 g/dL.

esomeprazole or pantoprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca AB, Södertälje, Sweden) immediately after hemostasis is achieved spontaneously or by gastroscopy. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole infusion. Because of concern for patient safety with certain drug-drug interactions, patients who take clopidogrel receive intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc®, Takeda, Singen, Germany), including an 80 mg loading dose and a 3-day continuous high-dose (8 mg/h) of infusion.

Endoscopic hemostasis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At the index gastroscopy, bleeding ulcers are checked. If the adherent clot is found over the ulcer base, it will be vigorously washed away with water jet. All of the stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) are treated by one or a combination of endoscopic therapies including local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000, bipolar heated probe at 20 J per goal consecutively until achievement of coaptive coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy. The success of endoscopic hemostasis is defined as cessation of bleeding together with achievement of cavitation at the vessel after application of the heater probe.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

esomeprazole or pantoprazole

Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca AB, Södertälje, Sweden) immediately after hemostasis is achieved spontaneously or by gastroscopy. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole infusion. Because of concern for patient safety with certain drug-drug interactions, patients who take clopidogrel receive intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc®, Takeda, Singen, Germany), including an 80 mg loading dose and a 3-day continuous high-dose (8 mg/h) of infusion.

Intervention Type DRUG

Endoscopic hemostasis

At the index gastroscopy, bleeding ulcers are checked. If the adherent clot is found over the ulcer base, it will be vigorously washed away with water jet. All of the stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) are treated by one or a combination of endoscopic therapies including local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000, bipolar heated probe at 20 J per goal consecutively until achievement of coaptive coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy. The success of endoscopic hemostasis is defined as cessation of bleeding together with achievement of cavitation at the vessel after application of the heater probe.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nexium® (AstraZeneca AB) or Pantoloc® (Takeda)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Bleeding peptic ulcers with major stigmata of recent hemorrhage
* All of these major SRH are treated by local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000 with or without combined therapy with a heater probe, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Bleeding due to tumor or cancer
* Bleeding due to the presence of a Dieulafoy lesion
* Ulcer bleeding due to mechanical factors (i.e., gastrostomy tube induction)
* Proton pump inhibitors use within one week before enrollment
* Failure to establish hemostasis under gastroscopy
* Hypersensitivity to esomeprazole, pantoprazole, or any component of the formulation
* Previously participated in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bor-Shyang Sheu, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cheng HC, Wu CT, Chen WY, Yang EH, Chen PJ, Sheu BS. Risk factors determining the need for second-look endoscopy for peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibitor infusion. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E255-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111499. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27004241 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A-ER-103-112

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Role of Octreotide in Non Variceal Bleeding
NCT06062719 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3