Noninvasive Ventilation Bundle in Postoperative Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT02214368

Last Updated: 2015-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators assessed the efficacy and safety of this noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) bundle strategy compared with a conventional treatment in postoperative patients with ARF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, prospective, open-label study. Postoperative patients with ARF included in the study were randomly assigned to intervention group or conventional treatment group. In the intervention group, NIV was early used for treatment of postoperative respiratory failure, if patients were inability to spontaneously clear airways from excessive secretions during NIV, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FBO) was used for suction of secretions , if patients showed intolerance or inadequate patient cooperation during the NIV session, they were sedated (Ramsay scale 2-3) by a continuous perfusion of propofol during the NIV session.

Patients assigned to the control group received supplemental oxygen, Respiratory therapists delivered this intervention using conventional masks or venturi oxygen, and adjusted FiO2 to achieve arterial O2 saturation of more than 92%. The application of noninvasive ventilation was considered, if patients failed the supplemental oxygen and met at least two of the following criteria:(1) severe respiratory distress with dyspnoea, respiratory rate\>30breaths/min, and clinical signs suggestive of respiratory-muscle fatigue or increased respiratory effort (use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal breathing, or intercostal indrawing), (2) respiratory acidosis (arterial pH of 7.35 or less with PaCO2 of 45 mm Hg or more) ;(3) arterial O2 saturation by pulse oximetry less than 90% or PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg at an FiO2\> 0.5 or breathing at least 10 l/min oxygen.

All the patients were continuous monitored of vital signs.whereas arterial blood gases were analyzed before NIV and 1h after NIV, before and after FBO, and once a day and in the case of any change either in the ventilatory settings or in the FIO2; duration of noninvasive ventilation, the rate and cause of endotracheal intubation, ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay in the ICU and in hospital, study procedure related complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NIV bundle group

early use of NIV, and combination fiberoptic bronchoscopy and sedation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early application of NIV

Intervention Type OTHER

Device:BiPAP Vision.

NIV bundle group : Early application of NIV(BiPAP Vision) in 1 h after randomization.

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device:fiberoptic bronchoscopy. NIV bundle group :When patients were inability to spontaneously clear airways from excessive secretions during NIV, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FBO) was used for suction of secretions.

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug:propofol.continuous perfusion of propofol (0.50-2.00 mg/kg/h).

NIV bundle group :When patients showed intolerance or inadequate patient cooperation during the NIV session, they were sedated (Ramsay scale 2-3) by a continuous perfusion of propofol (0.50-2.00 mg/kg/h).

In the conventional treatment group: No intervention.

Conventional treatment group

standard supplemental oxygen, and conventional application of noninvasive ventilation.

Group Type OTHER

Conventional application of NIV

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional treatment group:NIV(BiPAP Vision) was used, when patients failed the supplemental oxygen and met at least two of the following criteria:(1) severe respiratory distress with dyspnoea, respiratory rate\>30breaths/min, and clinical signs suggestive of respiratory-muscle fatigue or increased respiratory effort (use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal breathing, or intercostal indrawing), (2) respiratory acidosis (arterial pH of 7.35 or less with PaCO2 of 45 mm Hg or more) ;(3) arterial O2 saturation by pulse oximetry less than 90% or PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg at an FiO2\> 0.5 or breathing at least 10 L/min oxygen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early application of NIV

Device:BiPAP Vision.

NIV bundle group : Early application of NIV(BiPAP Vision) in 1 h after randomization.

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Device:fiberoptic bronchoscopy. NIV bundle group :When patients were inability to spontaneously clear airways from excessive secretions during NIV, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FBO) was used for suction of secretions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Propofol

Drug:propofol.continuous perfusion of propofol (0.50-2.00 mg/kg/h).

NIV bundle group :When patients showed intolerance or inadequate patient cooperation during the NIV session, they were sedated (Ramsay scale 2-3) by a continuous perfusion of propofol (0.50-2.00 mg/kg/h).

In the conventional treatment group: No intervention.

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional application of NIV

Conventional treatment group:NIV(BiPAP Vision) was used, when patients failed the supplemental oxygen and met at least two of the following criteria:(1) severe respiratory distress with dyspnoea, respiratory rate\>30breaths/min, and clinical signs suggestive of respiratory-muscle fatigue or increased respiratory effort (use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal breathing, or intercostal indrawing), (2) respiratory acidosis (arterial pH of 7.35 or less with PaCO2 of 45 mm Hg or more) ;(3) arterial O2 saturation by pulse oximetry less than 90% or PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg at an FiO2\> 0.5 or breathing at least 10 L/min oxygen.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Early application of BiPAP Vision (Respironics) Diprivan Conventional application of BiPAP Vision (Respironics)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Postoperative patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) were included in the study,who had to meet one of the following criteria
* Respiratory acidosis (arterial pH of 7.35 or less with PaCO2 of 45 mm Hg or more)
* Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio less than 250
* Dyspnoea with respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/min or use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal breathing

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiac or respiratory arrest; loss of consciousness
* Facial trauma or surgery or deformity sufficient to preclude mask fitting
* Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
* Haemodynamic instability or unstable cardiac arrhythmia
* Multiple organ failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West China Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhou Yongfang

Master of medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Y F Zhou, MM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of critical care medicine of West China Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Critical care medicine of West China Hospital

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YB20130097

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.