Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vertos Mild - Post Market Patient Outcomes
NCT01076244
Study Comparing Postoperative Treatment After Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
NCT05312281
Safety and Effectiveness Study of the TOPS System, a Total Posterior Arthroplasty Implant Designed to Alleviate Pain Resulting From Moderate to Severe Lumbar Stenosis
NCT00405691
The Vertos MILD™ Preliminary Patient Evaluation Study
NCT00749073
MiDAS II (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study
NCT01082159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients included in the clinical investigation will return for follow-up visits at 1 week for safety evaluation, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post-treatment to collect data for evaluation of safety and effectiveness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Totalis™ Direct Decompression Procedure
Totalis
Totalis
Comparator Procedure
Comparator Surgical Procedure
Comparator Surgical Procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Totalis
Comparator Surgical Procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) symptoms defined generally as leg/buttock/ groin pain and/or paresthesias that are exacerbated with standing and walking and relieved by flexion
* VAS leg symptom severity \>50 (in either leg) during episodes of neurogenic claudication
* Subjects who are able to walk a minimum of 50 feet without experiencing NIC symptoms
* Diagnosis of central canal spinal stenosis, with or without mild to moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1-L5 with radiologic evidence
* Subjects with persistent lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms that, during the course of the last year, have been unresponsive to a minimum of 6 months of conservative therapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Axial back pain only
* Severe foraminal stenosis at index level(s) and/or symptomatic foraminal stenosis at any lumbar level
* Severe lateral recess stenosis
* Lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels determined pre-operatively to require surgical intervention
* Prior decompressive surgery at index level (s) or fusion at any lumbar level
* Epidural steroid or nerve block steroid injection at index level(s) within 6 weeks of baseline assessments
* Spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis or retrolisthesis) greater than grade 1
* Spondylolysis (pars fracture)
* Significant degenerative lumbar scoliosis at index level(s)
* Morbid obesity
* Significant peripheral vascular disease
* Active significant co-morbidity
* Undergoing immunosuppressive therapy or long-term steroid use
* Current spinal cord stimulator or implanted pain pump
* Life expectancy less than 2 years
* Evidence of substance abuse within the year
* Involvement or potential involvement in litigation related to the spine or worker's compensation related to a back and/or leg issue
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VertiFlex, Incorporated
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Hope Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Arizona Pain Specialists
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Medhat Mikhael, M.D. Inc.
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Orthopedic Pain Specialists
Santa Monica, California, United States
Integrated Pain Management Medical Group, Inc.
Walnut Creek, California, United States
GWU - Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Florida Pain Institute
Merritt Island, Florida, United States
Pain Care, LLC
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
American Health Network
Muncie, Indiana, United States
Pain Management Associates
Independence, Missouri, United States
University Pain Medicine Center
Somerset, New Jersey, United States
Oklahoma Pain Physicians
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Performance Spine and Sports Physicians, PC
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
SC Pain & Spine Specialists
Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States
Spine Team Texas
Southlake, Texas, United States
Virginia iSpine Physicians PC
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-TDDS-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.