The MOTION Study - Treatment of LSS With the MILD Procedure

NCT ID: NCT03610737

Last Updated: 2024-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-02

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study examining functional improvement in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients with neurogenic claudication who are treated with the MILD procedure plus conventional medical management (CMM) compared to those treated with CMM alone, as the control. Subjects in the control group are able to crossover and receive MILD after completion of 12-month follow-up. The study will provide objective functional improvement data for patients treated with the mild Procedure as first-line therapy in a real-world setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will follow participants treated in the MILD plus CMM group and crossover participants for up to 5 years on annual bases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic Claudication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MILD with CMM

The MILD procedure is an image-guided minimally-invasive lumbar decompression with conventional medical managment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MILD Procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.

Other Name: MILD lumbar decompression

Conventional Medical Management (CMM)

Intervention Type OTHER

CMM can include physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.

CMM alone

Patient in the CMM alone group can have physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Medical Management (CMM)

Intervention Type OTHER

CMM can include physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MILD Procedure

The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.

Other Name: MILD lumbar decompression

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Medical Management (CMM)

CMM can include physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients experiencing neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months duration.
* LSS with neurogenic claudication
* Radiologic evidence of LSS with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum ≥ 2.5mm confirmed by pre-op MRI or CT performed within 12 months of baseline visit.
* Patients with comorbid conditions commonly associated with spinal stenosis, such as osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, minor spondylolisthesis (Grade I without instability), foraminal stenosis, and/or disk protrusion may be included unless the treating physician has determined that the condition is too advanced.
* Stable opioid intake with no change during 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Available to complete all follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* ODI Score \< 31 (0-100 ODI Scale).
* NPRS Score \< 5 (0-10 NPRS Scale).
* Lumbar epidural injections during eight weeks prior to study enrollment.
* Baseline analgesic medication greater than 90 milligram morphine equivalent (MME).
* Prior surgery at the same treatment level.
* Previously received interspinous spacer at the same treatment level.
* Previously received intradiscal procedure at the same treatment level.
* Previously received vertebral augmentation procedure at the same treatment level.
* Previously received the MILD procedure at the same treatment level.
* Received radiofrequency ablation at the same or the adjacent levels within 6 months prior to study enrollment.
* History of spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
* Grade II or higher spondylolisthesis.
* Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
* Unable to walk ≥ 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain. In this context, 'unaided' means without the use of a cane, walker, railing, wall, another person or any other means of walking assistance.
* Previously randomized and/or treated in this clinical study.
* Epidural lipomatosis (if it is deemed to be a significant contributor of canal narrowing by the physician).
* On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vertos Medical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Newport Heache & Pain

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Centura Spine Center

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Spine & Pain Institute of Florida

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

SIMED

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Pain Management and Rehabilitation Center

Seymour, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas Pain Management

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Interventional Pain Management Specialists

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

MI Interventional Pain Center

Brownstown, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Pain Specialists

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Center for Pain Management

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Roanoke-Chowan Pain Management

Ahoskie, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

UH St. John Pain Management Center

Westlake, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Pennsylvania Pain & Spine Institute

Chalfont, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Precision Spin Care

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Center for Pain Relief

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Deer TR, Chafin TB, Costandi SJ, Qu H, Kim C, Jassal N, Patel K, Calodney A. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild(R) procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Pract. 2024 Jan;24(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/papr.13293. Epub 2023 Sep 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37661347 (View on PubMed)

Deer TR, Costandi SJ, Washabaugh E, Chafin TB, Wahezi SE, Jassal N, Sayed D. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild(R) Procedure: One-Year Results. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):625-634. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac028.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35167700 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Motion

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The MiDAS ENCORE Study
NCT02093520 COMPLETED NA