Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT02006901
Last Updated: 2015-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
721 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-01-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prospectively registered treatment and outcome data are obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The NORDSTEN Studies/ The Spinal Stenosis Study
NCT02007083
Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; Comparison of Two Different Surgical Methods; Mini-invasive Decompression to X-stop
NCT00546949
Long-term Reoperations After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
NCT06407063
Outcome of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - a Comparison of Data From Three National Quality Registries
NCT02897947
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
microdecompression
surgical microdecompression using a bilateral or unilateral approach depending on the surgeon's preference and the individual patient's anatomy and symptoms.
microdecompression
a minimal invasive surgical technique
laminectomy
the spinous process and the laminae of the involved level(s) as well as the medial aspects of the facet joints are resected
laminectomy
The traditional open surgical technique: decompression with removal of the spinous process, lamina and often the medial facets
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
microdecompression
a minimal invasive surgical technique
laminectomy
The traditional open surgical technique: decompression with removal of the spinous process, lamina and often the medial facets
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Operation in ≤2 lumbar levels with either open decompressive laminectomy, bilateral microdecompression or unilateral microdecompression for bilateral decompression in the time period between October 2006 and December 2011
* Included in the NORspine registry
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous surgery in the lumbar spine
* Discectomy as part of the decompression
* Associated pathological entities such as disc herniation, spondylolisthesis or scoliosis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sasha Gulati, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Olavs Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St.Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lonne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM, Nygaard OP, Gulati S. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. BMJ. 2015 Apr 1;350:h1603. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1603.
Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lonne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM, Nygaard OP, Gulati S. Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 20;4(3):e004651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004651.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013/643
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.