Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT02006901

Last Updated: 2015-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

721 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: This observational study is designed to test the equivalence between the clinical effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy in the surgical treatment of central lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly, and as the oldest segment of the population continues to grow its prevalence is likely to increase. However, data on surgical outcomes are limited. Open or wide decompressive laminectomy, often combined with medial facetectomy and foraminotomy, was formerly the standard treatment. In recent years a growing tendency towards less invasive decompressive procedures has emerged. Many spine surgeons today perform microdecompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis.

Prospectively registered treatment and outcome data are obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis Spinal Cord Compression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

microdecompression

surgical microdecompression using a bilateral or unilateral approach depending on the surgeon's preference and the individual patient's anatomy and symptoms.

microdecompression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a minimal invasive surgical technique

laminectomy

the spinous process and the laminae of the involved level(s) as well as the medial aspects of the facet joints are resected

laminectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The traditional open surgical technique: decompression with removal of the spinous process, lamina and often the medial facets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

microdecompression

a minimal invasive surgical technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laminectomy

The traditional open surgical technique: decompression with removal of the spinous process, lamina and often the medial facets

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of central lumbar spinal stenosis
* Operation in ≤2 lumbar levels with either open decompressive laminectomy, bilateral microdecompression or unilateral microdecompression for bilateral decompression in the time period between October 2006 and December 2011
* Included in the NORspine registry

Exclusion Criteria

* History of lumbar fusion
* Previous surgery in the lumbar spine
* Discectomy as part of the decompression
* Associated pathological entities such as disc herniation, spondylolisthesis or scoliosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Olavs Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sasha Gulati, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Olavs Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St.Olavs Hospital

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lonne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM, Nygaard OP, Gulati S. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. BMJ. 2015 Apr 1;350:h1603. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1603.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25833966 (View on PubMed)

Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lonne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM, Nygaard OP, Gulati S. Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 20;4(3):e004651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004651.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24650809 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013/643

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The NORDSTEN Study - Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02051374 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA