Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; Comparison of Two Different Surgical Methods; Mini-invasive Decompression to X-stop
NCT ID: NCT00546949
Last Updated: 2016-02-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02006901
The NORDSTEN Studies/ The Spinal Stenosis Study
NCT02007083
Long-term Reoperations After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
NCT06407063
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441
Microdecompression Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterior Stabilization for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
NCT04087694
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
decompression
Minimal invasive decompression
Minimal invasive decompression
foraminotomy, laminotomy, microscopic decompression
x-stop
X-stop, an interspinous decompression device
Interspinous Process Decompression (IPD)
Interspinous device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minimal invasive decompression
foraminotomy, laminotomy, microscopic decompression
Interspinous Process Decompression (IPD)
Interspinous device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* diagnosed on MRI in maximum two levels
* walking distance on 250 metres
* symptom relief on flexion of the lumbar spine
* duration of the symptoms more than 6 months
* non-operative treatment is tried or considered as not indicated
Exclusion Criteria
* spinal stenosis on more than 2 levels
* cauda equina syndrome
* severe paresis
* clinical monoradiculopathy
* grave scoliosis
* previous lumbar surgery
* degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 25%
* spondylolysis with listhesis
* osteoporotic fracture in lumbal column
* clinical and radiological (both) arthritis in the hip joint
* ASA \>3
* verified polyneuropathy on neurophysiological test
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Greger Lønne, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Norwegian University of Sciense and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nastional Senter for Spinal Disorders
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lonne G, Johnsen LG, Rossvoll I, Andresen H, Storheim K, Zwart JA, Nygaard OP. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):77-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000691.
Lonne G, Johnsen LG, Aas E, Lydersen S, Andresen H, Ronning R, Nygaard OP. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):514-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000798.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NSSL-16279
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.