Comparison Between Surgical and Conservative Treatment for Lumbar Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT05315466
Last Updated: 2022-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-08
2017-06-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441
Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Scoliosis
NCT01439906
Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
NCT06335511
Efficiency of Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03365401
Spinal Stenosis and Listhesis Treated With Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer: a Non-surgical Trial
NCT05527145
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conservative treatment may include different approaches, such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, physical therapy, Global Postural Rehabilitation, magnetic therapy, laser therapy, TENS, massage, cognitive-behavioral therapy and all those procedures that can bring benefit in back and legs pain.
Surgical treatment:
Surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis is the decompression surgery which relieves the nerve structures to prevent permanent neurological damage. Decompression can be made on one or more segments of the spine and can be done with laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, laminotomy.
During a laminotomy part of the vertebral lamina is removed above and below the compressed nerve. The opening created is sometimes enough to relieve the compression on the nerve. In most cases, also the disc material and bone spur that compress the nerve are removed.
During a laminectomy the vertebral lamina is completely removed, along with the disc and the bone material that compress the nerves. The opening produced by the removal of the lamina is protected by back muscles and ligaments.
If the damage has occurred at several levels and bone of the vertebral support structures must be removed to achieve decompression, it can be performed a stabilization surgery with vertebral bone fusion (arthrodesis) in order to avoid instability of the column. Fusion is carried out to eliminate the mobility between different vertebrae and it is achieved using bone derived from the patient's iliac crest or from a donor. The bone gradually grows and melts with the same vertebrae. This limits the movements that may have been one of the causes of back pain. It takes about six months for it to achieve a solid bony spinal fusion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-surgical treatment
Different types of non-surgical treatments
Non-surgical treatment
Analgesics, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, physical therapy, Global Postural Rehabilitation, magnetic therapy, laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS), massage, cognitive-behavioral therapy and all those procedures that can bring benefit to back and leg pain.
Surgical treatment
Surgical treatment for spinal stenosis
Surgical treatment for spinal stenosis
Decompression of nerve structures by laminotomy or laminectomy and posterior lumbar fusion if stabilization of the column is required.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-surgical treatment
Analgesics, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, physical therapy, Global Postural Rehabilitation, magnetic therapy, laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS), massage, cognitive-behavioral therapy and all those procedures that can bring benefit to back and leg pain.
Surgical treatment for spinal stenosis
Decompression of nerve structures by laminotomy or laminectomy and posterior lumbar fusion if stabilization of the column is required.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alessandro Gasbarrini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kovacs FM, Urrutia G, Alarcon JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1335-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820c97b1.
Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1424-35; discussion 1435-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00016.
Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimaki T, Ronty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Harkanen T, Hurri H; Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136.
Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1351-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RF MINSAL2009.STENOSI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.