Long-term Evolution of Patients Suffering From Lumbar Canal Stenosis and Supported by Minimally Invasive Surgery: SUIVISTENO
NCT ID: NCT04124146
Last Updated: 2019-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-12-01
2021-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
describe the evolution of pain, satisfaction, quality of life of patients to more than 5 years pot intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04778943
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04469387
Comparison Between Surgical and Conservative Treatment for Lumbar Stenosis
NCT05315466
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant.
NCT05645497
Research on Key Technology Development and Clinical Application of Small Interactive Spinal Endoscopic Surgery Robot
NCT06480214
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Surgical treatment is obviously indicated from the outset in emergency situations or in cases of severe functional disability. It is most often proposed in case of failure of a complete and well-conducted medical treatment. In practice, in cases of tight canal stenosis, only a surgical operation can relieve the patient of pain and recover a normal walk.
A minimal invasive technique: lumbar recalibration, which consists of decompression of the roots of the horse's tail under a microscope without fusion, without arthrodesis, provides a short-term functional benefit, even when Grade 1 spondylisthesis exists. The interest of this technique for the patient is twofold: first aesthetic because the incision is much smaller than in the classical technique and becomes almost invisible after a few months; then and above all it is functional because, by preserving the paravertebral muscles that it allows, this procedure is less painful and allows a lift the same day and an earlier recovery activities.
Very few scientific publications compare different surgical techniques, and even fewer results are available on the long-term future of patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with Surgery more than 10 years
Patients with surgery for spinal lumbar stenosis between 2006 and 2008 will be purposed to participate to the study.
MRI for some patients according functionnal tests results
Depending on the results obtained on the evaluation criteria, additional examinations could be prescribed (imaging) for subjects with an unsatisfactory functional score. There is therefore a potential change in the usual care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI for some patients according functionnal tests results
Depending on the results obtained on the evaluation criteria, additional examinations could be prescribed (imaging) for subjects with an unsatisfactory functional score. There is therefore a potential change in the usual care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Major patient (18 years old or over).
* Francophone.
* Affiliated to a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria
* Vulnerable persons according to article L1121-6 of the CSP.
* Major persons placed under guardianship or curatorship
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Medico-Chirurgicale et Obstetrique Cote d'Opale
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUIVISTENO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.