MiDAS III (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study

NCT ID: NCT01315145

Last Updated: 2015-08-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

138 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-center, prospective, observational clinical study to compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the mild® procedure or epidural steroid injection in patients with moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was initially designed as a randomized trial. Due to difficulty of enrollment, the study was amended and converted to an observational comparative study with study arm being self-selected by the patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression

Patients receiving percutaneous decompression using the mild® Device Kit.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.

Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural Steroid Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression

The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epidural Steroid Injection

Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mild procedure mild lumbar decompression ESI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication where the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of back and leg pain average is ≥ 5.
* Prior failure of conservative therapy.
* Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 31%.
* Radiologic evidence of LSS, with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum ≥ 4.1mm confirmed by pre-op MRI performed within 6-12 months of baseline visit.
* Able to walk ≥ 10 feet before being limited by pain.
* Available to complete 24-months of follow-up.
* Adults ≥ 50 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
* History of spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
* Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
* Significant/symptomatic disc protrusion or osteophyte formation judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
* Excessive facet hypertrophy judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
* Significant symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
* Confirmed anterior or retro-listhesis ≥ 3mm.
* Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants with the inability to withhold anticoagulants for required time prior to procedure.
* Able to walk ≥ 200 yards unaided in erect non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
* Able to stand ≥ 15 minutes in erect, non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
* Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 7 days of treatment.
* Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
* Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 32 as calculated using the patient's weight multiplied by 703 then divided by height in inches squared.
* Epidural steroid, systemic steroid or any spine interventional procedure within prior six weeks of study procedure.
* Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent and to understand and complete follow-up patient reported outcomes forms.
* Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
* On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.
* Unable to tolerate MRI (pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, etc.).
* Intrathecal pump.
* Any medical condition determined by the Investigator that would not allow subject to fulfill trial requirements or safely tolerate procedures in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vertos Medical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nagy Mekhail, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HOPE Research Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Center for Pain and Supportive Care

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Pain Clinic of Monterey Bay

Aptos, California, United States

Site Status

Pain Control Associates of San Diego

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Navarro Pain Control Group, Inc.

Solana Beach, California, United States

Site Status

IPM Medical Group, Inc.

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

The GW Pain Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Interventional Pain Physicians of South Florida

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Holy Cross Interventional Spine & Pain Medicine Center

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Space Coast Pain Institute

Merritt Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Millennium Pain Center

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Commonwealth Pain Specialists, PLLC

Frankfort, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

The Spine Center Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Michigan Pain Specialists

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Interventional Pain Center

Brownstown Twp., Michigan, United States

Site Status

Occupational and Pain Management Professionals

Crystal City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lab2Marche' LLC

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Virtua Pain and Spine Specialists

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

The Center for Clinical Research, LLC

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Neurospine Institute

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Axis Spine Care

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Space City Pain Specialists, LLP

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Center for Pain Relief, Inc.

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

The Center for Pain relief Tri-State

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MiDAS III

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id