MiDAS II (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study
NCT ID: NCT01082159
Last Updated: 2013-04-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MiDAS I (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study
NCT00956631
MiDAS III (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study
NCT01315145
Vertos Mild - Post Market Patient Outcomes
NCT01076244
The Vertos MILD™ Preliminary Patient Evaluation Study
NCT00749073
Comparative Study of Sham Versus Mild® Procedure in Patients Diagnosed With Symptomatic Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis
NCT01129921
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lumbar decompression
Percutaneous lumbar decompression with mild® Device Kit.
lumbar decompression
The mild® devices used in this study are specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform percutaneous lumbar decompressive procedures for the treatment of various spinal conditions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lumbar decompression
The mild® devices used in this study are specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform percutaneous lumbar decompressive procedures for the treatment of various spinal conditions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prior failure of conservative therapy and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score \> 20%.
* Radiologic evidence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (typically \> 2.5 mm), confirmed by pre-op MRI and/or CT.
* Central canal cross sectional area clearly reduced per MRI/CT report.
* If present, anterior listhesis preferred ≤ 5.0mm and deemed stable by Investigator.
* Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
* Available to complete 26 weeks of follow-up.
* A signed Informed Consent Form is obtained from the patient.
* Adults at least 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Compound fracture with interspinal retropulsion contributing to spinal stenosis.
* Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
* Disc protrusion or osteophyte formation severe enough to confound study outcome.
* Facet hypertrophy severe enough to confound study outcome.
* Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants.
* Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 5 days of treatment.
* Epidural steroid administration within prior three weeks (of procedure).
* Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g.chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
* Metabolic wound healing pathologies deemed by Investigator to compromise study outcomes.
* Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
* Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
* On Workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vertos Medical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David L Caraway, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Center for Pain Relief Tri-State, PLLC
Bohdan W Chopko, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MedCentral Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Space Coast Pain Institute
Merritt Island, Florida, United States
The Spine Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Occupational and Pain Management Professionals
Festus, Missouri, United States
Lab2Marche, LLC
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
MedCentral Health System
Mansfield, Ohio, United States
Kenneth Alo, MD, PA-TX
Houston, Texas, United States
The Center for Pain Relief Tri-State, PLLC
Huntington, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MiDAS II
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.