Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT01316211
Last Updated: 2020-06-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
246 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective Evaluation of Performance of Coflex® Interlaminer Technology Versus Decompression With or Without Fusion
NCT03041896
Coflex PS3 Actual Conditions for Use Study
NCT02555280
Post-Approval Clinical Trial Comparing the Long Term Safety and Effectiveness Coflex vs. Fusion to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00534235
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Decompression With an Interlaminar Implant in Patients With Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Caused by Lumbar Stenosis
NCT01727752
The Coflex®COMMUNITY Study: An Observational Study of Coflex® Interlaminar Technology
NCT02457468
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This was a randomized multicenter study to collect prospective data for potential improvement in the therapy of low back pain during the treatment of spinal stenosis. The study was conducted in Germany.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
coflex™
Implantation of coflex™ device in assigned patients
Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression
The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant.
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression
The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
Surgical decompression
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
If necessary additional decompression in the adjacent segment(s) may be performed avoiding any instability in the affected segment.
In addition the following may exist (but is not obligatory):
* hypertrophy of the facet joints and subarticular recessus stenosis in the relevant segment or
* stenosis of the foramen in the relevant segment
* and/or stable retrolisthesis up to grade I verified by flexion-/extension X-ray films.
2. Radiographic confirmation of no translatory instability in the main segment as well as in adjacent segments (dynamic translatory instability ≤ 3 mm).
3. VAS back pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm scale (for acute back pain or a period of at least 3 month of back pain before the onset of leg pain).
4. Minimum of 3 months conservative therapy without improvement of symptoms.
5. Age \>40 years.
6. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score of at least 18/45 (40%) for German sites or 20/50 (40%) for the US sites (The question about sexual life will be excluded).
7. Suitability of the patient for a posterior surgery procedure.
8. Mental and physical ability of patient to follow the protocol according to compliance to time schedule, treatment plan, fill in of CRF pages and further study procedures.
9. Personally signed informed consent form before the start of any study related procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Preceding fusion or decompression surgery of the lumbar spine or preceding nucleotomy of the segments of concern (also if nucleotomy becomes necessary during surgery).
2. Radiographically confirmed damage of the vertebral body in the segment of concern in the lumbar spine (e.g. osteoporotic compression fracture or because of tumors)
3. Isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis; retrolisthesis \> grade I) or spondylolysis (Pars fracture).
4. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (\> 25°).
5. Adipositas (obesity). Defined as a body mass index \>40.
6. Pregnancy, or wish to get pregnant during the course of the study.
7. Known allergy for titanium and titanium alloys.
8. Fluoride infections - both systemic and local.
9. History of severe peripheral neuropathy.
10. Significant peripheral vascular disease (claudication intermittens ≥ stage 2b).
11. M. Paget or osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disorders.
12. Cauda equina syndrome.
13. Communicating diseases, including HIV, active hepatitis
14. Patients who are lawfully kept in an institution.
15. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, will be inappropriate for inclusion into this clinical trial or will not comply with requirements of the study.
16. Subjects who participated in a clinical observation or therapy with X-ray during the last 10 years.
17. Subjects who participate(d) in another clinical trial (within the last 4 weeks) that might influence the safety and effectiveness assessment of this trial.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MDT Medical Device Testing GmbH
INDUSTRY
MCRA
INDUSTRY
Paradigm Spine
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oberlinklinik Potsdam Orthopädische Fachklinik
Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Frankfurt a.M.
Frankfurt a.M., Hesse, Germany
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Rostock Neurochirurgie
Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg Klinik für Orthopädie
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Ostseeklinik Damp Neurochirurgie
Damp, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Klinik für Neurochirurgie Lübeck
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Klinik für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie mit Skoliosezentrum Klinikum Neustadt
Neustadt, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Klinikum Ingolstadt Neurochirurgie
Ingolstadt, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schmidt S, Franke J, Rauschmann M, Adelt D, Bonsanto MM, Sola S. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Apr;28(4):406-415. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17643. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06k004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.