Comparison of Clinical Performance of the Guardian Laryngeal Mask With LMA Proseal

NCT ID: NCT02063516

Last Updated: 2015-01-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare insertion characteristics of 2 different supraglottic devices (Guardian LMA and Proseal LMA) and to observe any associated complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Condition:

The study focuses on the comparison of the ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic position and ease of gastric tube placement between the Guardian LMA and the LMA Proseal in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.

Device: Guardian Laryngeal Mask Device: LMA Proseal

Study Type:

Interventional

Study Design:

Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Efficacy of Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Guardian

Device: Guardian Laryngeal Mask

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Guardian Laryngeal Mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

Proseal

Device:Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Guardian Laryngeal Mask

Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 to 65 years of age
* Mallampati score less than 3
* thyromental distance more than 6.5 cm
* mouth opening more than \>2.5 cm
* a body mass index less than 35 kg/m2;

Exclusion Criteria

* Body weight 50 Kg
* Pregnancy
* Difficult airway
* Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection and sore throats
* A history of esophageal reflux disease
* ENT surgery
* Laparoscopic surgery
* Inability to understand the Study Information Sheet and provide a written consent to take part in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Haiyun Wang

vice-Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 1;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25929558 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Wang001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.