Comparison of Clinical Performance of the Guardian Laryngeal Mask With LMA Proseal
NCT ID: NCT02063516
Last Updated: 2015-01-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-06-30
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Non Crossover Study of the GuardianTM Versus SupremeTM Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT01575236
Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres
NCT02852135
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391
Comparison in Difficult Airway Scenario Induced in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic™, LMA™ - Flexible and LMA - Proseal™
NCT02979171
Comparison of the LMA Protector and the I-gel
NCT03078517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study focuses on the comparison of the ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic position and ease of gastric tube placement between the Guardian LMA and the LMA Proseal in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Device: Guardian Laryngeal Mask Device: LMA Proseal
Study Type:
Interventional
Study Design:
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Guardian
Device: Guardian Laryngeal Mask
Guardian Laryngeal Mask
Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Proseal
Device:Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Guardian Laryngeal Mask
Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mallampati score less than 3
* thyromental distance more than 6.5 cm
* mouth opening more than \>2.5 cm
* a body mass index less than 35 kg/m2;
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Difficult airway
* Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection and sore throats
* A history of esophageal reflux disease
* ENT surgery
* Laparoscopic surgery
* Inability to understand the Study Information Sheet and provide a written consent to take part in the study.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Haiyun Wang
vice-Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 1;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Wang001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.