Promoting Veteran-Centered Colorectal Cancer Screening

NCT ID: NCT02027545

Last Updated: 2023-05-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

436 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-20

Study Completion Date

2018-08-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Systematic efforts to improve colorectal cancer screening use in the VA Healthcare System have resulted in an increase in not only appropriate, but also inappropriate use of screening. The purpose of this study is to test a new, more patient-centered approach to colon cancer screening. In older individuals (ages 70 to 75) who are "due" for screening, the investigators will provide education on the benefits and harms of colon cancer screening. But instead of simply providing these patients with "average" information about these benefits, the investigators will give them information that takes into account their personal characteristics (e.g., age, gender), overall health, and screening history and therefore applies to them more personally. The investigators will also work with the health system to create time and space for patient and doctor to discuss whether screening is the right choice for each individual. This way, patients can make an informed choice about what is right for them, with the help of their doctor. In the future, the results of this study will help patients make more informed screening decisions, especially when the benefits of screening may be uncertain for them personally.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a widely recommended, evidence-based preventive service that has traditionally been underused. Over the last decade, organized efforts by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to increase population screening among Veterans have been successful. But these population-centered efforts have increased screening utilization in a way that is not always concordant with screening benefit, particularly among older Veterans, those with comorbid illness, and those who have previously been screened. As patients get older, acquire health problems, and undergo negative screening tests, the benefit of screening decreases and the potential harm of screening increases. Yet, existing population-centered efforts fail to adequately inform these patients about this changing balance in benefit and harm, often yielding screening utilization that is discordant with benefit. The purpose of this study is to test a more Veteran-centered approach to screening in these individuals, one that encourages informed, personalized screening decisions based on individual values, preferences, and health status.

The 3-part intervention consists of: (1) a decision aid to help Veterans make informed screening decisions; (2) education for providers on how the benefits of screening vary between patients; and (3) modification of clinical reminder systems to allow Veterans to make informed decisions about screening. The intervention will be tested in a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial (cluster = provider) at two sites in the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System. The primary outcome will be whether screening was ordered at the clinic visit. The investigators will also assess the appropriateness of screening orders (i.e., whether screening is ordered in concordance with screening benefit), conceptual understanding of screening, elements of informed decision-making addressed in the screening discussion, and screening utilization at 6 months.

Note: In March 2023, during preparation of the final manuscript for submission for publication, the study team noted that one subject in the intervention arm had undergone colorectal cancer screening immediately prior to the study visit (but after assessment for study eligibility), making the subject ineligible (protocol violation). Study results were re-analyzed accordingly and updated on clinicaltrials.gov (analyzed N=431 rather than N=432). Additionally, a data entry error was noted on clinicaltrials.gov for the secondary outcome of screening utilization (control N=96 rather than control N=95).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A cluster-randomized (by provider) pragmatic trial of the patient-centered intervention versus pragmatic control.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decision Aid

Patients of primary care providers randomly assigned to the Decision Aid intervention (DA) that includes an individualized decision aid, provider education, and modified performance measure/reminder.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decision Aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Printed booklet comprising educational information about benefits and harms of screening, individualized estimates of benefits and harms of screening, and values clarification exercise

Provider Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Providers of patients in both arms of the study will be given an educational module about recent data on the benefits and harms of screening how these data fit in with existing population-centered guidelines.

Performance Measure Modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The clinical reminder system will be modified so to facilitate documentation of informed decision making about CRC screening, including specific reasons for not screening. Additionally, providers who indicate a specific exception for not screening (using the modified clinical reminder) will be considered as satisfying the requirements and will not be penalized in terms of performance pay, and will be removed from feedback reports that encourage population screening.

No Decision Aid

Patients of primary care providers will be randomly assigned to the pragmatic control (PC) that includes provider education and modified performance measure/reminder, but no decision aid.

Group Type OTHER

Provider Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Providers of patients in both arms of the study will be given an educational module about recent data on the benefits and harms of screening how these data fit in with existing population-centered guidelines.

Performance Measure Modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The clinical reminder system will be modified so to facilitate documentation of informed decision making about CRC screening, including specific reasons for not screening. Additionally, providers who indicate a specific exception for not screening (using the modified clinical reminder) will be considered as satisfying the requirements and will not be penalized in terms of performance pay, and will be removed from feedback reports that encourage population screening.

Simple Informational Booklet

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A simple informational booklet explaining colorectal cancer screening and current screening recommendations.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision Aid

Printed booklet comprising educational information about benefits and harms of screening, individualized estimates of benefits and harms of screening, and values clarification exercise

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Provider Education

Providers of patients in both arms of the study will be given an educational module about recent data on the benefits and harms of screening how these data fit in with existing population-centered guidelines.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Performance Measure Modification

The clinical reminder system will be modified so to facilitate documentation of informed decision making about CRC screening, including specific reasons for not screening. Additionally, providers who indicate a specific exception for not screening (using the modified clinical reminder) will be considered as satisfying the requirements and will not be penalized in terms of performance pay, and will be removed from feedback reports that encourage population screening.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Simple Informational Booklet

A simple informational booklet explaining colorectal cancer screening and current screening recommendations.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 70-75 years
* Due for screening according to the 2008 USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guideline
* Scheduled for a non-urgent primary care visit at the Ann Arbor VA Medical Center or Toledo VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinic

Exclusion Criteria

* Increased risk for colorectal cancer (and therefore not candidates for average-risk screening)
* Limited life expectancy (e.g., enrolled in hospice or diagnosed with metastatic cancer), or for whom the provider previously documented an intention not to pursue screening.
* Scheduled for an appointment where stimulating a discussion about screening is likely to be inappropriate: urgent appointment (for acute complaints), follow-up visit after hospitalization
* Have a condition that would impair his/her ability to participate in the study: dementia or other cognitive impairment, visual impairment, non-English speaking
* Assigned to an ineligible primary care provider (i.e., the provider did not consent to the study)
* Have Medical Guardian who makes decisions for the patient about his/her care
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sameer D. Saini, MD MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saini SD, van Hees F, Vijan S. Smarter screening for cancer: possibilities and challenges of personalization. JAMA. 2014 Dec 3;312(21):2211-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13933. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25461993 (View on PubMed)

van Hees F, Saini SD, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Vijan S, Meester RG, de Koning HJ, Zauber AG, van Ballegooijen M. Personalizing colonoscopy screening for elderly individuals based on screening history, cancer risk, and comorbidity status could increase cost effectiveness. Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1425-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.042. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26253304 (View on PubMed)

Caverly TJ, Kerr EA, Saini SD. Delivering Patient-Centered Cancer Screening: Easier Said Than Done. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Oct 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26456874 (View on PubMed)

Veenstra CM, Abrahamse P, Wagner TH, Hawley ST, Banerjee M, Morris AM. Employment benefits and job retention: evidence among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):736-745. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1371. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29473344 (View on PubMed)

Saini SD, Lewis CL, Kerr EA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Hawley ST, Forman JH, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Hees F, Saffar D, Myers A, Gauntlett LE, Lipson R, Kim HM, Vijan S. Personalized Multilevel Intervention for Improving Appropriate Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Dec 1;183(12):1334-1342. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5656.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37902744 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.screeningdecision.com

Click here for more information about this study: Promoting Veteran-Centered Colorectal Cancer Screening

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 12-411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessing Repeat Fit Testing for CRC
NCT03248661 COMPLETED PHASE3