Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
536 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-07-01
2029-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promoting Veteran-Centered Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT02027545
The Identification of Prognostic Factors of Late Stage Disease, Particularly Those That Are Modifiable, That Might Explain the Worsened Prognosis With Colorectal Cancer Among Veterans.
NCT00007618
Initiation of Colon Cancer Screening in Veterans or "Start Screening Now"
NCT01079533
Translation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Practice: A System Intervention
NCT00122187
Life Expectancy-informed Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT07141901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Significance: CRC is a leading cause of cancer death among Veterans. To maximize CRC screening benefit in individuals younger than 50 years, it is critical to 1) identify high-risk individuals in this age group who may be targeted for screening and 2) assess the effectiveness and implementation of interventions to promote screening in all younger individuals. Innovation \& Impact: Currently there are no risk scores for EOCRC in clinical use, and risk scores developed for research often use genetic and survey data but omit more readily accessible information from the electronic health record (EHR) to identify individuals at increased risk. In addition to identifying high-risk individuals, it is also crucial to study interventions that will increase screening in the younger population. Otherwise, data show that younger adults are less likely to engage in screening and passive adoption of new clinical guidelines occurs slowly among physicians.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: To develop and validate a risk score for EOCRC using EHR data Aim 2: To determine the effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to increase screening in individuals aged 45-49 years, using personal risk as a motivator for high-risk individuals. This aim is the focus of the trial.
Aim 3: To evaluate the implementation of the multilevel intervention.
Methodology: The investigators plan to 1) build and validate an EOCRC risk score using EHR data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), 2) identify a prospective cohort of Veterans aged 45-49 years and conduct a 2x2 factorial multilevel intervention that includes informing high-risk patients and their primary care providers about their risk status, and 3) assess for barriers and facilitators to implementing the multilevel intervention through a qualitative process evaluation with key informants.
Next Steps/Implementation: If this novel risk stratification strategy to prevent EOCRC is effective at a single site, then the investigators will work with partners to implement it throughout the VA and test it outside of the VA system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient intervention
Only patients receive intervention
Patient intervention
Patient intervention has 2 components. 1) The investigators will send patients a letter that promotes screening and contains targeted messages based on the individual's demographic characteristics. 2) Study staff who is trained in patient navigation will call each patient up to 3 times to confirm receipt of the letter and conduct one-on-one education about screening using a standardized script.
PCP intervention
Only PCP receives intervention
PCP intervention
PCP intervention has 2 components. 1) PCPs of patients who are randomized to this group will receive an initial email that provides a list of all patients assigned to the PCP who are randomized to the PCP intervention. PCPs will be specifically informed which patients are high-risk. The email will also include a personal report card with the percentage of patients assigned to the provider who are up-to-date with CRC screening in two age groups: 45-49 years and 50-75 years. Subsequently, PCPs will receive weekly emails with a list of patients randomized to the PCP intervention who are scheduled for a clinic visit with them. 2) The investigators will design a local clinical dashboard using Microsoft Power BI that allows PCPs to view a list of their patients who are randomized to the PCP intervention as well as provide a link to this in each email. High-risk patients will be specifically marked.
Combined
Both patient and PCP receive intervention
Patient intervention
Patient intervention has 2 components. 1) The investigators will send patients a letter that promotes screening and contains targeted messages based on the individual's demographic characteristics. 2) Study staff who is trained in patient navigation will call each patient up to 3 times to confirm receipt of the letter and conduct one-on-one education about screening using a standardized script.
PCP intervention
PCP intervention has 2 components. 1) PCPs of patients who are randomized to this group will receive an initial email that provides a list of all patients assigned to the PCP who are randomized to the PCP intervention. PCPs will be specifically informed which patients are high-risk. The email will also include a personal report card with the percentage of patients assigned to the provider who are up-to-date with CRC screening in two age groups: 45-49 years and 50-75 years. Subsequently, PCPs will receive weekly emails with a list of patients randomized to the PCP intervention who are scheduled for a clinic visit with them. 2) The investigators will design a local clinical dashboard using Microsoft Power BI that allows PCPs to view a list of their patients who are randomized to the PCP intervention as well as provide a link to this in each email. High-risk patients will be specifically marked.
Control
Neither patient nor PCP receives intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient intervention
Patient intervention has 2 components. 1) The investigators will send patients a letter that promotes screening and contains targeted messages based on the individual's demographic characteristics. 2) Study staff who is trained in patient navigation will call each patient up to 3 times to confirm receipt of the letter and conduct one-on-one education about screening using a standardized script.
PCP intervention
PCP intervention has 2 components. 1) PCPs of patients who are randomized to this group will receive an initial email that provides a list of all patients assigned to the PCP who are randomized to the PCP intervention. PCPs will be specifically informed which patients are high-risk. The email will also include a personal report card with the percentage of patients assigned to the provider who are up-to-date with CRC screening in two age groups: 45-49 years and 50-75 years. Subsequently, PCPs will receive weekly emails with a list of patients randomized to the PCP intervention who are scheduled for a clinic visit with them. 2) The investigators will design a local clinical dashboard using Microsoft Power BI that allows PCPs to view a list of their patients who are randomized to the PCP intervention as well as provide a link to this in each email. High-risk patients will be specifically marked.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior CRC diagnosis
* Prior total colectomy
* Limited life expectancy (defined as terminal illness, hospice enrollment, or documented life expectancy \<6 months on the medical problem list or a health factor in the EHR
* Deactivated national CRC screening and surveillance reminder (due to risk level or comorbidities)
45 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter S Liang, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIR 23-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.