Translation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Practice: A System Intervention
NCT ID: NCT00122187
Last Updated: 2015-04-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-08-31
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
NCT01299493
Promoting Veteran-Centered Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT02027545
Rural Colon Cancer Screening Toolkit Intervention
NCT04651504
Interventions to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT00692211
Life Expectancy-informed Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT07141901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2.To conduct a qualitative evaluation to identify implementation barriers and facilitators, and to guide modifications of the CRC-ENS. 3.To conduct an outcome evaluation to determine the effectiveness of the intervention to:
a. increase the proportion of patients with a positive FOBT receiving CDE. b. reduce the time-lag between notification of a positive FOBT result and scheduling of a follow-up endoscopic procedure. 4. To improve patient compliance with follow-up recommendations through combined scheduling.
Methods: The CRC-ENS intervention employs a relatively simple alteration to the current electronic mechanism for notifying the primary care provider (PCP) of when a positive FOBT is recorded. With the CRC-ENS, this notification will be forwarded to the gastroenterology (GI) clinic as well as the PCP. This notification at the GI clinic will set off a cascade of events that would normally only be triggered by a consult request from the PCP. In this translation study, eight participating VHA sites will be randomly assigned to either the CRC-ENS intervention or usual care group. The proposed project will take two years to complete. During the first project year, the participating sites will be recruited and randomized. Pre-intervention change of awareness strategies will be initiated at all intervention sites. The CRC-ENS intervention will be implemented in the second project year, and formative evaluation (including two sets of focus groups) will be carried out throughout the intervention period. Post-intervention data collection, outcome evaluation and dissemination of results will be carried out in months 18-24.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic Consult System
A new consult system designed to automatically send a gastroenterology consult request for patients with positive fecal occult blood testing (FOBT+) results
Electronic Consult System
Consult system is an event notification system programmed to function within the VA electronic medical record system.
Usual Care
The usual and customary procedures for addressing FOBT+ results: primary care physicians continued to be responsible for follow up of FOBT+ results.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electronic Consult System
Consult system is an event notification system programmed to function within the VA electronic medical record system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Linda L. Humphrey, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
Tucson, Arizona, United States
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO
Denver, Colorado, United States
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Portland, Oregon, United States
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
VA Medical & Regional Office Center, White River
White River Junction, Vermont, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tsai TT, Nallamothu BK, Prasad A, Saint S, Bates ER. Clinical problem-solving. A change of heart. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):1010-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcps0903023. No abstract available.
Messersmith WA, Ahnen DJ. Targeting EGFR in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1834-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0806778. No abstract available.
Humphrey LL, Shannon J, Partin MR, O'Malley J, Chen Z, Helfand M. Improving the follow-up of positive hemoccult screening tests: an electronic intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):691-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1639-3. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRT 02-059
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.