A Program for Improved Family Screening for Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03620877

Last Updated: 2021-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-24

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A first- degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenoma before age 65 is associated with a high risk of CRC. For these high-risk subjects, the French 2013 recommendations advise colonoscopy screening, but participation is insufficient (26-54%).The purpose of this project is to propose, through association of multidisciplinary research teams (public health, sociology, linguistic), actors on the field (physicians, organized screening facilities), and decision makers, relevant and effective interventions in the framework of a public health program, enabling increased participation of relatives of patients with CRC or adenoma before age 65 in targeted screening for CRC by colonoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenoma before age 65 is associated with a high risk of CRC. For these high-risk subjects, the French 2013 recommendations advise colonoscopy screening, but participation is insufficient (26-54%).The purpose of this project is to propose, through association of multidisciplinary research teams (public health, sociology, linguistic), actors on the field (physicians, organized screening facilities), and decision makers, relevant and effective interventions in the framework of a public health program, enabling increased participation of relatives of patients with CRC or adenoma before age 65 in targeted screening for CRC by colonoscopy.

Description of the intervention: This program, offered in 4 departments is divided into 3 phases:

1. Sensitization of doctors to the recommendations. This is a collaborative work with clinicians to enable them i) to take ownership of the problem and generic documents used in the previous study and ii) to define an intervention logic to encourage them to systematically inform subjects with RCC or advanced adenoma before age 65 the increased risk related to their 1st degree.
2. Coordinated transmission of information from the patient's physician to the relative's physician under consent of the patient and his/her relatives. Under the terms established with the actors in the previous phase, the physician delivers standard information to the index patient, presents the generic documents and may adapt the procedure to each patient's needs. With support of the coordination team which collects the coordinates of 1st degree relatives, the patient's physician transmits the information to the relatives and their doctors. The coordination team, during this experimental phase, will be the team of Epidemiology, Cancer Registry of Poitiers University Hospital, under the responsibility of public health physicians. The coordination team contacts each relative on behalf of the index patient's consent, acting by delegation of the index patient's physician, informs about the transmission of information given to the index patient, requests the agreement of the relative that the patient's doctor would contact his/her doctor to inform, under cover of professional secrecy, of the medical context.
3. Personalized information of relatives by a preventive nurse based on validated prevention models (individual psychosocial factors associated with screening and behavioral stage). At most two years after diagnosis of the index patient, the relative's colonoscopy performance status will be ascertained by the coordination team in connection with the attending physician. If the relative has had a colonoscopy carried out, the coordination team shall document the results and note the date scheduled for the following exam. If the relative has not had a colonoscopy carried out, he shall then receive a personalized intervention, based on the intervention evaluated in the previous study, as a supplement to the action of his/her doctor.

Qualitative and quantitative evaluations will follow each phase to measure the acceptability, coverage, efficiency, to assess transferability of the program. Moreover the program will be evaluated by a population survey conducted by the cancer registry that covers the geographical area of the experimentation with data collection that identify exhaustively the patients with CRC or high-grade adenoma.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

personalized intervention

Personalized intervention by a preventive nurse, relying on validated prevention models, in improving participation in the colonoscopic screening of siblings

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Personalized intervention by a preventive nurse, relying on validated prevention models, in improving participation in the colonoscopic screening of siblings

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized intervention

Personalized intervention by a preventive nurse, relying on validated prevention models, in improving participation in the colonoscopic screening of siblings

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First-degree relatives of an index patient: father, mother, children, brothers and sisters (aged more than 18 years).

Informed and oral consent of the participant after clear and fair information on the study

Exclusion Criteria

* The persons concerned by the articles L.1121-5 to L1121-8 and L.1122-1-2 of the Code de la santé publique will not be included in the interviews of the qualitative studies.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Poitiers University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Ingrand, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Poitiers, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

INGRAND

Poitiers, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pierre Ingrand, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

33-5.49.45.43.45

Isabelle Ingrand, PhD

Role: CONTACT

33-5.49.45.42.35

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

INGRAND Pierre, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(2):216-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.023. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16338133 (View on PubMed)

Ingrand I, Defossez G, Richer JP, Tougeron D, Palierne N, Letard JC, Beauchant M, Ingrand P. Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004303.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27537555 (View on PubMed)

Taouqi M, Ingrand I, Beauchant M, Migeot V, Ingrand P. Determinants of participation in colonoscopic screening by siblings of colorectal cancer patients in France. BMC Cancer. 2010 Jul 6;10:355. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-355.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20602807 (View on PubMed)

Ingrand I, Dujoncquoy S, Beauchant M, Letard JC, Migeot V, Ingrand P. General practitioner and specialist views on colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;33(3-4):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19683486 (View on PubMed)

Ingrand I, Dujoncquoy S, Migeot V, Ghadi V, Beauchant M, Ingrand P. Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Feb 2;2:47-55.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19920944 (View on PubMed)

Ng SC, Lau JY, Chan FK, Suen BY, Tse YK, Hui AJ, Leung-Ki EL, Ching JY, Chan AW, Wong MC, Ng SS, To KF, Wu JC, Sung JJ. Risk of Advanced Adenomas in Siblings of Individuals With Advanced Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study. Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):608-16; quiz e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26584600 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COLOR 3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.