Impact of Training Patient-centered Approach on Shared Decision in Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT ID: NCT06074536
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-06
2027-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Teaching General Practitioners to Use the Patient-centered Approach When Suggesting Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT03938623
Does the Invitation by the General Practitioner Improve Patients' Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?
NCT01279278
Patients Navigator for Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT02369757
Uncovering the Barriers of Colorectal Cancer Screening Amongst Siblings of Colorectal Cancer Patients.
NCT03395938
Does the Recall by the General Practitioner Improve Patients' Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?
NCT01279330
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In France, CRC screening is based on a guaiac faecal occult blood test in subjects at risk average, carried out every 2 years from 50 to 74 years old. In the event of a positive test, a colonoscopy should be performed. Participation in the programme colorectal cancer screening has been declining since 2016-2017.
The implementation of screening faces many barriers on the physian's side and/or on the patient's side. During of the last 2020-2021 screening campaign, only 6.1 million people took a screening test, which represented a participation rate of 28.9%, while it is commonly admitted that a screening rate \>50% would be necessary to reduce CRC mortality.
Some barriers are specific to CRC screening. for patient, reluctance to carry out screening, analysis of stools, and fear of cancer. For the physian, the discomfort in approaching screening and the uncertainty of the relevance of the test for some patients. The know-how and quality of information and communication with patients is at the forefront.
Physian must adapt their communication to the possibilities understanding of the subject to explain, convince, and bring the patient to carry out screening. Active listening is a technique particularly suitable for adopting a person-centred approach making it possible to take into account the patient perspectives in order to arrive at a shared decision.
This most often involves helping and giving the patient the means to manage their problems, involving them in a prevention project (non-requesting patient) or supporting them and motivating them in their approach (requesting patient).
The hypothesize of this study is that training general practitioners in a patient-centered approach will enable the implementation of greater shared decision-making work with the patient during a CRC screening presentation consultation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional arm
The recruited GPs will be randomized into 2 parallel groups (interventional and control). Following this randomization, the GPs from the interventional group will undergo face-to-face training to the patient-centered approach.
patient-centered approach training
face to face training of general practitioner of interventional arm
Control arm
The GPs of the control group will take care the patient according to current screening recommendations and procedures organized by the colorectal cancer (CCR) mass screening.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
patient-centered approach training
face to face training of general practitioner of interventional arm
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eligible for organized CRC screening,
* Having declared as attending clinician a general practitioner investigator of the study
✓ Consulting their attending clinician for the duration of the study,
* AND able and willing to comply with all trial requirements
\- ✓ Screened for CRC less than 2 years ago
* Not eligible for organized CRC screening:
* History of adenomas or CRC:
\- Family (1st degree)
* Personal history of IBD:
* Crohn's disease
* Ulcerative colitis)
* Hereditary predispositions:
* Familial adenomatous polyposis
* Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome)
* Patient with symptoms requiring colonoscopy
* Having a level of literacy that does not allow the completion of the self-questionnaire.
* Having an inability to give express consent.
* Being under guardianship, curatorship or having cognitive disorders
50 Years
74 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CNGE Conseil
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Isabelle AUGER-AUBIN, Pr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
cabinet de groupe pluriprofessionnel 40 rue Carnot 95230 Soisy-Sous-Montmorency
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cabinet de groupe pluriprofessionnel
Soisy-sous-Montmorency, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IDRCB:2023-A00859-36
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CNGE-2021-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.