Shared Decision-making and Colorectal Cancer Screening

NCT ID: NCT04748380

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-18

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Conduct a feasibility pilot RCT of a newly developed colorectal cancer screening (CRC) decision aid (DA) including 66 LHL adults 76-85 years recruited from community health centers. Hypotheses: Patients in the intervention group will be more likely to change their intentions to be screened with fewer patients with \<10 year LE and/or those with \>10 year LE and no risk factors intending to be screened and more with \>10 year LE and risk factors for CRC and/or those who have never been screened intending to be screened (primary outcome). The secondary outcomes are that the patients in the intervention group will have 1. increased knowledge of CRC screening options and the benefits and risks of these options; 2. increased SDM engagement; and 3. find the DA acceptable. Investigators also anticipate that at least 50% of eligible participants will choose to participate in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Investigators will recruit and survey 66 adults (to reach a goal of 60 with complete data), 75-85 years with low health literacy LHL (30 per arm) over 24 months to learn the effects of the newly developed CRC DA pamphlet on older adult's screening intentions, knowledge of options and the benefits and harms, and SDM from community health centers. Investigators collect baseline data over the phone prior to the visit. Patients who are eligible and willing to participate will come to a regularly scheduled visit with their primary care physician (PCP) early to answer the pretest questions. Stratifying by sex, 30 participants will be randomized to receive the CRC DA pamphlet and 30 will be randomized to receive the home safety information at the visit in case they cancel their appointment and reschedule. The home safety information is 2 pages, and was designed by AGS Health in Aging Foundation. It has been used successfully in prior studies of DAs as a control intervention. Investigators chose this pamphlet for the control arm because it is written at \<7th grade reading level and reading about home safety should not affect screening decisions. Providing the control group the home safety pamphlet to read reduces response bias since it helps keep participants blinded to the intervention of interest and compensates for the time and attention required by the intervention group to read the DA. At the visit, participants will review the DA or the home safety pamphlet. The revised CRC DA pamphlet is expected to take 5-10 minutes to read as well as the home safety pamphlet. After completing the pre-survey questionnaire before the visit the patient will have their PCP visit. The post-test will be asked after the PCP visit in person or over the phone (depending on the participant's preference, access to a phone, and ability to stay after their appointment for enough time to complete the post-visit questionnaire). Investigators will conduct a chart review at 6 months to see if a CRC screening discussion occurred and the outcome (i.e., qualitative trends in use of CRC screening). Investigators will also call each patient at 6 months to ask about their CRC screening intentions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Stratifying by sex, 30 participants will be randomized to receive the CRC DA pamphlet and 30 will be randomized to receive the home safety information at the visit in case they cancel their appointment and reschedule.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Stratifying by sex, 30 participants will be randomized to receive the CRC DA pamphlet and 30 will be randomized to receive the home safety information at the visit in case they cancel their appointment and reschedule.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CRC DA

Stratifying by sex, 30 participants will be randomized to receive the CRC DA pamphlet.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CRC decision aid pamphlet

Intervention Type OTHER

A newly developed 8-10 page decision aid pamphlet that discusses:1. Information on CRC; 2. Information about risk and benefits including the 10-year lag-time to benefitting from CRC screening; 3. Information to help patients evaluate CRC screening options (colonoscopy or stool testing); 4. Possible outcomes relevant to LE and health status. In addition, there will be a values clarification exercise

Home Safety Pamphlet

Stratifying by sex, 30 will be randomized to receive the home safety information at the visit.

Group Type OTHER

Home Safety Pamphlet

Intervention Type OTHER

The home safety information pamphlet is a 2-page fact sheet on home safety tips for older adults, and was designed by the AGS Health in Aging Foundation. It includes information in seven areas to help older adults stay safe in their homes. Areas include but are not limited to fall prevention and safety proofing homes. It has been used successfully in prior studies of DAs as a control intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home Safety Pamphlet

The home safety information pamphlet is a 2-page fact sheet on home safety tips for older adults, and was designed by the AGS Health in Aging Foundation. It includes information in seven areas to help older adults stay safe in their homes. Areas include but are not limited to fall prevention and safety proofing homes. It has been used successfully in prior studies of DAs as a control intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

CRC decision aid pamphlet

A newly developed 8-10 page decision aid pamphlet that discusses:1. Information on CRC; 2. Information about risk and benefits including the 10-year lag-time to benefitting from CRC screening; 3. Information to help patients evaluate CRC screening options (colonoscopy or stool testing); 4. Possible outcomes relevant to LE and health status. In addition, there will be a values clarification exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be between the ages of 75 and 85 years
* Must be low health literacy (LHL), determined by participants' response to the validated LHL question, "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" with a response of, "somewhat to not at all confident."39-43
* Have an educational level at community college or less

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who do not have the capacity to participate
* Patients with dementia
* Patients with a history of invasive/non-invasive colorectal cancer.
* Patients older than 85 years since guidelines recommend against CRC screening in this age range.
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tamara J. Cadet, PhD, LICSW, MPH

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania Health System

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

850357

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UPCC 11223

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.