Elders Preferences in Care Decisions

NCT ID: NCT01575990

Last Updated: 2022-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

424 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to explore ways to improve appropriate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly by attempting to target screening in those most likely to benefit and avoiding screening in those least likely to benefit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial at the patient level to determine the efficacy of a colorectal cancer screening decision support intervention for patients ages 70 to 84 within a clinical setting. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the intervention will prepare patients for individualized decision making with their providers and result in an improvement in appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening outcomes. To assess appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening, the investigators will use a classification scheme derived from the literature based on age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Using this scheme, appropriate screening will include screening for those in the best health because they are likely to benefit, no screening for those in the worst health because they are unlikely to benefit, and evidence of a discussion about CRC screening for those in the intermediate health group because the benefit is unclear.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Detection of Cancer Colon Cancer Decision Making Patient-Centered Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Making A Decision About CRC Screening

A decision support intervention that is a literacy sensitive paper based tool with educational information targeted to the patient's age and gender.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Making A Decision About CRC Screening

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Targeted by age and gender with 3 components.

1. Educational component
2. Values clarification exercise
3. Individualized decision making worksheet

The intervention or control condition is administered before the index visit with the patient's provider.

Drivers 65 Plus

The placebo comparator is an attention control with information about driving tips for drivers age 65 and older.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Drivers 65 Plus

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This text booklet is provided as an attention control for those in the control arm and like the intervention is administered prior to the index visit with the patient's provider.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Making A Decision About CRC Screening

Targeted by age and gender with 3 components.

1. Educational component
2. Values clarification exercise
3. Individualized decision making worksheet

The intervention or control condition is administered before the index visit with the patient's provider.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Drivers 65 Plus

This text booklet is provided as an attention control for those in the control arm and like the intervention is administered prior to the index visit with the patient's provider.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 70 Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 75 Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 80 Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 70 Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 75 Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 80 Attention control Control condition

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women ages 70 to 84
* Not up to date with colon cancer screening or surveillance

Exclusion Criteria

* Men and women younger than 70 years of age or older than 84
* History of Colorectal Cancer
* Inflammatory bowel disease
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

84 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carmen L Lewis, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina

Rowena J Dolor, MD, MHS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke Practiced Based Research Network

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C, Kistler CE, Dolor RJ, Bertin KB, Suresh K, Patel SG, Lewis CL. Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244982. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44982.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36469317 (View on PubMed)

Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF, Morris C, Ferrari R, Barclay C, Brewer NT, Dolor R, Harris R, Vu M, Golin CE. A Decision Aid to Promote Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 Jul;38(5):614-624. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18773713.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29847251 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P01HS021133-01

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

11-1638

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Colon Cancer Prevention Study
NCT00924690 COMPLETED NA
Korean CRC Screening Study PT13599
NCT04478110 COMPLETED NA