CHOICE: Communicating Health Options Through Information and Cancer Education
NCT ID: NCT00134589
Last Updated: 2009-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
450 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2009-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness Study of a Computer-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid
NCT00558233
Colon Cancer Prevention Study
NCT00924690
Improving Colon Cancer Screening for Diverse Populations
NCT02054598
Impact of Protect Your Colon™ on CRC Screening
NCT05929820
Helping Patients and Providers Make Better Decisions About Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT04683731
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We are conducting a cluster-randomized trial in health practices in Georgia and Florida, to test the effectiveness of a decision aid (video + brochures) for increasing adherence to CRC screening guidelines. Thirty-two large group practices were recruited and randomized to receive usual care (routine reminders) or an evidence-based decision aid intervention. In each practice, patients between the ages of 52 and 75, without current CRC screening history, were enrolled into the study.
In early 2007, we received a full HIPAA waiver that permitted us to send the decision aid intervention to long-term non-responders in the intervention group, and to access claims data for this group and the long-term non-responders in the usual care group. This procedure will make it possible for us to learn more about the real-world impact of the intervention.
The intervention will continue for up to 2 years for still-unscreened participants. The main outcome is receipt of an evidence-based modality of CRC screening according to the US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines (FOBT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or double contrast barium enema).
Unique features of the proposed study include its potential to establish systems to increase screening uptake that will help fulfill HEDIS requirements; improving our understanding of how screening promotion interventions work in both White and Black populations; collaboration with a community partner of the Emory Prevention Research Center, and forging collaborative relationships between public health and health care researchers, and the affected communities of health plans and health care providers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Academic Detailing (Medical Practices)+Decision Aids (Patients)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aetna Health Plan member
* Average risk for colorectal cancer
* Did not have colorectal cancer screening within guideline time frame (1 to 10 years, depending on individual's age and type of screening)
Exclusion Criteria
* Family history of colorectal cancer/polyps
52 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina
OTHER
Aetna, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory University Rollins School of Public Health
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pignone M, Winquist A, Schild LA, Lewis C, Scott T, Hawley J, Rimer BK, Glanz K. Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial. Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;117(15):3352-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25924. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
Pignone M, Scott TL, Schild LA, Lewis C, Vazquez R, Glanz K. Yield of claims data and surveys for determining colon cancer screening among health plan members. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):726-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0751.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDC-NCCDPHP-R-01-PH-000018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.