Using Effective Provider-Patient Communication to Improve Cancer Screening Among Low Literacy Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

What's the purpose of this study? This 4-year study is designed: (1) to teach primary care physicians how to recognize low health literacy patients and effectively counsel them on cancer screening using risk communication and shared decision making and (2) to assess the impact of training on changes in physician communication behavior and changes in low health literacy patients' cancer screening behaviors. This study proposal is based on the hypothesis that physician training in cancer screening guidelines, health literacy, and communication skills will improve provider-patient interactions during encounters dealing with preventive health maintenance especially cancer screening.

How will the proposed study be implemented? Thirty-two physicians in the New Orleans metropolitan area will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The unit of randomization will be the health care organization or clinic. The intervention group will receive training in health literacy, cancer screening, risk communication and shared decision-making. The control group will not receive communication training until the end of the study. Physicians in both groups will undergo three clinic visits with standardized patients (actors trained to portray real patients; mystery shoppers) but they will not be aware that they are conducting visits with actors. The visits will occur at study enrollment and at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each clinic visit, the standardized patients will rate the physicians' communication skills. Each physician assigned to the intervention group will receive verbal feedback on communication skills from the standardized patients and complete a web-based tutorial. Physicians in the control group will not have access to the web-based tutorial until the end of the study.

For each physician, 10-15 patients with limited health literacy will be recruited to the study. Each patient will rate his/her perceived involvement with care and global satisfaction with care at study enrollment and annually for three years. Age and gender-appropriate referral rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening and patients' receipt of such screening will be assessed annually for three years. All study physicians, regardless of group assignment, will receive performance feedback (report cards) on their cancer screening rates among low health literacy patients in their clinic.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Health Literacy Interventions to Overcome Disparities in CRC Screening

NCT02360605

Colorectal Cancer

COMPLETED NA

Low-Literacy Physician-Patient Intervention Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening

NCT01103479

Colorectal Cancer

COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3

Evaluating Strategies to Present Colon Cancer Screening Information

NCT02485561

Colonic Neoplasms Colorectal Neoplasms Colonic Diseases +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Improving Comprehensive Cancer Screening Among Vulnerable Patients Using Patient Navigation

NCT02553538

Patient Compliance

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness Study of a Computer-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid

NCT00558233

Colorectal Cancer Health Literacy

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer Breast Cancer Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No communication training

Physicians enrolled in the control arm do not undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Cancer risk ommunication skills training

Physicians enrolled in the intervention arm undergo training in health literacy, cancer screening and shared decision making

Group Type OTHER

Cancer risk communication skills training

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM). At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback. After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert. Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading. Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cancer risk communication skills training

Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM). At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback. After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert. Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading. Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Physician

* Physicians who practice at these clinic sites at least one half day per week are eligible to participate in this study.

Patient

* Eligible patients include men and women age 40 to 75, individuals enrolled in the clinic practice for at least one year, and individuals identified as having low or inadequate health literacy via the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine.

Exclusion Criteria

Physician

* Any provider planning to leave before the end of 12 months will be excluded.

Patient

* Patients will be excluded if they plan to change primary care provider or site of health plan, have resided in the United States for less than five years, or do not speak English

Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes