Information With or Without Numbers For Optimizing Reasoning About Medical Decisions

NCT ID: NCT02477553

Last Updated: 2019-07-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

728 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-08-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Experts believe that increasing the low uptake of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) requires educating patients about all approved tests and helping them choose one that fits their preferences. As one motto puts it: "The best test is the one that gets done." Screening tests range from more invasive and very sensitive for polyps and cancer (colonoscopy) to less invasive and less sensitive (e.g., fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)). But it is unclear how best to educate patients about the options and the tradeoffs involved. Some guidelines recommend that decision aids, a promising tool in this area, provide patients with detailed quantitative information, including baseline risk, risk reduction, and chance of negative outcomes. But this sort of "comparative effectiveness" data can confuse patients, especially those with limited mathematical ability. Previous studies have not measured the effect of providing quantitative information to patients with varying levels of ability or interest or asked them whether such data is essential for their decision-making.

The investigators will conduct a clinical trial to determine the impact on patients who view a decision aid (DA) that includes quantitative information versus a DA without such data. The investigators will also seek to determine whether numeracy moderates the effect of quantitative information.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quantitative

Subjects view:

1. A computer-based presentation regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and screening for CRC with colonoscopy and stool testing. Includes excerpts from a video from the American Cancer Society.
2. Computer-based presentation providing quantitative information regarding (a) the lifetime average probability of getting and dying from CRC, (b) the reduction in morbidity and mortality provided by colonoscopy and stool tests, (c) the sensitivity of colonoscopy and stool tests for finding cancer, (d) the false negative values of colonoscopy and stool tests for finding cancer, (e) the risk of heavy bleeding or colon injury from colonoscopy, and (f) the chance of having a positive stool test.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DA - Quantitative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Verbal

Subjects view:

1. A computer-based presentation regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and screening for CRC with colonoscopy and stool testing. Includes excerpts from a video from the American Cancer Society.
2. Computer-based presentation providing verbal information regarding (a) the lifetime average probability of getting and dying from CRC, (b) the reduction in morbidity and mortality provided by colonoscopy and stool tests, (c) the sensitivity of colonoscopy and stool tests for finding cancer, (d) the false negative values of colonoscopy and stool tests for finding cancer, (e) the risk of heavy bleeding or colon injury from colonoscopy, and (f) the chance of having a positive stool test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DA - Verbal

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DA - Quantitative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

DA - Verbal

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Have not had colonoscopy performed in last 10 years, sigmoidoscopy in last 5 years, or fecal occult blood testing (including FIT) in last 1 year and
2. have a scheduled appointment or due to schedule an appointment with a healthcare practitioner at our performance sites.

Exclusion Criteria

1. undergoing workup for symptoms consistent with colon cancer, such as weight loss or rectal bleeding
2. have a diagnosis or medical history conferring elevated risk for CRC including polypectomy or colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, certain inherited syndromes, or a significant family history of CRC
3. are unable to speak and read English.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter Schwartz

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter H Schwartz, M.D., Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDR-1403-11040

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1502774679

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.