Increasing Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening In Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT01099826
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
511 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-10-31
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT03200366
Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate
NCT01568151
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Clinics
NCT00737646
Motivational Interviewing for Colonoscopy
NCT01877096
Screening for Familial Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients
NCT00632515
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary aim of this study is to compare CRC screening test use among 804 participants randomly allocated to control or intervention conditions; participants will be recruited from the two sites (Chicago, IL, and Nashville, TN). The 3 study groups will receive (1) standard care, (2) tailored health communication, and (3) motivational interviewing. Eligibility criteria for study participants includes being 50 years or older, not having CRC, and being of average or moderate risk for CRC. Study participants will be surveyed by telephone about CRC-related beliefs pre-intervention (Time 1), 1 month postintervention (Time 2), and at 6 months postintervention (Times 3 and 4, respectively). Dichotomous behavioral outcomes (had screening test or not) and stages of CRC screening test adoption (based on the TTM) will be assessed, as well as sociodemographic and belief predictors of screening behavior. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression models will be used to evaluate screening test use and stage of test adoption. Sociodemographic and belief variables will be used as covariates, with intervention group as the primary independent predictor. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA will be employed to assess between intervention differences in amenable beliefs. Path (mediation) analysis will be performed to further explore the underlying mechanisms through which THC and MI may differentially affect CRC screening behavior.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lifestyle counseling tailored
Tailored counseling
education tailored to baseline beliefs by trained counselor over phone
lifestyle counseling motivational
Motivational Interview
motivational interview by trained MI counselors by phone
control
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tailored counseling
education tailored to baseline beliefs by trained counselor over phone
Motivational Interview
motivational interview by trained MI counselors by phone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* can speak, read, write English
* no diagnosis of colorectal cancer
* non-adherent with screening
* age 50 or older
Exclusion Criteria
* adherent with screening
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center
FED
University of Utah
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Penn State University
OTHER
Portland State University
OTHER
Arizona State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Usha Menon
Faculty
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Usha Menon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Arizona State University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wahab S, Menon U, Szalacha L. Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 8.
Menon U, Belue R, Wahab S, Rugen K, Kinney AY, Maramaldi P, Wujcik D, Szalacha LA. A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.