Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans

NCT ID: NCT00893295

Last Updated: 2013-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

896 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Screening may help doctors find colorectal cancer sooner, when it may be easier to treat. Finding out what affects a patient's decision to undergo screening tests may help increase the number of patients who undergo regular screening for cancer. It is not yet known whether personalized invitations to undergo colorectal cancer screening are more effective than standard screening reminders.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying ways to increase colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* To assess the intervention impact on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization over a 6-month observation period in African-American participants.
* To assess the intervention impact on CRC screening preference, classified into three levels (i.e., "decided not to screen or never heard of," "undecided," or "decided to screen"), based on data obtained from both the endpoint chart audit and the endpoint survey.
* To assess intervention impact on population health-management representations related to CRC screening, as assessed by perceived salience and coherence and self-efficacy related to CRC screening measured with 6 to 10 Likert-type items on both the baseline and endpoint surveys.
* To analyze intervention cost-effectiveness, from the societal perspective and from the more limited perspective of the provider and payer, focusing on the average and incremental cost per additional person who is compliant (i.e., has a CRC screening test during the observation period) for each alternative intervention and estimate the cost per life-year saved.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Participants are stratified according to practice. Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms.

* Arm I (standard-intervention group): Participants receive a personalized screening invitation letter encouraging selection and performance of one of the screening tests, a generic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening informational booklet, stool blood testing (SBT) cards, and instructions for arranging a colonoscopy screening appointment. After 45 days, participants who have not been screened receive a reminder letter.
* Arm II (tailored-navigation intervention group): Participants receive a CRC screening invitation letter and materials that are tailored to the individual's preferred screening test strategy (i.e., SBT; SBT and instructions for arranging flexible sigmoidoscopy, instructions for arranging flexible sigmoidoscopy; or instructions for arranging colonoscopy). After 30 days, participants who have not been screened will receive a reminder by telephone. Those participants who have undergone screening will be congratulated for taking the time and preventative action, and be encouraged to continue future screenings. After 45 days, participants who have not been screened receive a reminder letter.

Participants are assessed by a baseline survey consisting of personal background, cognitive and psychological representations, social support and influence, intention, and decision stage related to screening SBT and colonoscopy preference. Data obtained from the endpoint survey assessing whether participants and their providers discussed CRC screening before the study and opinions about the intervention, and an endpoint chart audit to gather data on participant CRC screening exam dates and exam results (i.e., screening SBT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, double-contrast barium enema \[DCBE\] x-ray) are assessed for group differences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

colon cancer rectal cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

informational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

medical chart review

Intervention Type OTHER

screening questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

study of socioeconomic and demographic variables

Intervention Type OTHER

barium enema injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

colon imaging study

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

screening colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sigmoidoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Noncompliant with CRC screening in terms of American Cancer Society guidelines
* Attended an office visit within the past 2 years

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* No family history of colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 60 years
* No prior diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia (cancer or polyps) or inflammatory bowel disease

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* Not specified
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ronald Myers, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Clinical Trials Office - Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jeffer

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TJUH-RSGT-08-017-01-CPPB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

08G.89

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000635953

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id