Narrative or Fact-Based Videos in Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screenings in African American Communities

NCT ID: NCT02100254

Last Updated: 2022-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1310 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-01

Study Completion Date

2017-09-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized clinical trial studies narrative or fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings in African American communities. Informational videotapes may help increase the number of participants who engage in colonoscopy screenings. It is not yet known whether narrative videos may be more effective than fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Assess both individual and environmental factors that guide decisions and behaviors to engage or not engage in colonoscopy screenings for African Americans in the two communities.

II. Using a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach, develop and pilot a peer-led, narrative-based colorectal cancer behavioral intervention for increasing colonoscopy screening behaviors in African Americans.

III. Examine the efficacy of a narrative communication-style group intervention compared to a didactic intervention to influence African Americans' engagement in colorectal cancer screening, including examining the degree to which the community interventions impact cognitive and affective decision making factors about health care seeking.

IV. Examine and explore contextual factors that may influence the process of behavior change to better understand colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and health care seeking behaviors.

OUTLINE: Program locations are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by personal narrative.

ARM II: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by informative fact-based message.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Healthy, no Evidence of Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (personal narrative)

Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by personal narrative.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

behavioral intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

View personal narrative informational video

Arm II (fact-based message)

Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by informative fact-based message.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

behavioral intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

View fact-based informational video

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

behavioral intervention

View personal narrative informational video

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

behavioral intervention

View fact-based informational video

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Behavior Conditioning Therapy Behavior Therapy Behavioral Modification Behavioral Therapy Behavioral Treatment Behavior Conditioning Therapy Behavior Therapy Behavioral Modification Behavioral Therapy Behavioral Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants in each component (focus groups, surveys and educational programs) will be 18 years of age and over; these men and women are generally healthy, ambulatory and able to participate in events in their community; no women, men, or children of any ethnic or social background will be excluded from the educational program
* EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION:
* Currently non-adherent to colorectal cancer screening
* Self-identify as African American
* Are 50 years of age or older
* Have the ability to provide informed consent in English
* FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENTS:
* Must be non-adherent for CRC screening at the time of the educational program
* Have telephone service (mobile or landline), to participate in the follow up interviews
* Agree to providing consent for release/review of their medical record

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speaking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deborah Erwin

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kiviniemi MT, Klasko-Foster LB, Erwin DO, Jandorf L. Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans. Health Psychol. 2018 May;37(5):481-490. doi: 10.1037/hea0000603. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29595298 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2013-01707

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I 159309

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I 159309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Test Up Now Education Program
NCT04304001 COMPLETED NA