Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Colorado

NCT ID: NCT00137592

Last Updated: 2012-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

480 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This community based participatory research study involves multicomponent educational interventions. Telephone interviews and focus groups of persons who are residents of the High Plains region of Colorado will be conducted. A card study will also be carried out to collect limited data about colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices. The multicomponent intervention approaches (e.g., small media and group education) consist of educational materials about routine colorectal cancer screening.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims:

* Using community-based participatory research (CBPR), incorporate an existing Community Advisory Council into a project-specific Joint Planning Committee to provide community voices and be experts for a project to design strategies to improve CRC screening of all adults over the age of 50 in the High Plains community.
* Work with the Joint Planning Committee to develop an acceptable and respectful message and dissemination plan to change the community perception concerning colorectal cancer screening.
* Conduct a random digit dialing survey of rural eastern Colorado to determine rates of individuals up to date on CRC screening and to determine current knowledge level of individuals over 50 concerning the need for CRC screening.
* Deliver the screening message(s) through the methods suggested by the Joint Planning Committee in two High Plains communities and solicit community members' reactions to the message(s) and dissemination approaches.

Setting

The Intervention Communities:

The nine rural counties within northeast Colorado that make up the High Plains communities encompass 15,000-square-miles. The economy is largely agricultural, with a population of approximately 90,000. Based on the 2000 census 22% (range 20-29%) of the population is over 50, which is higher than the state as a whole (20%) or the Denver Metropolitan Statistical Area - MSA (18%). There is not a single MSA in the High Plains region and most of the region is a frontier area and therefore considered an underserved community.

The Control Communities:

We will also utilize the 8 county region in southeastern Colorado as our control communities for the intervention evaluation.

Primary Care Offices:

This study will be conducted within the community detailed above. The intervention will be at the population level. Evaluation of the intervention will include surveys of providers and patients within the primary care offices in the High Plains Region (these offices are part of the High Plains Research Network \[HPRN\]) and piloting the intervention will occur in the primary care practices that are part of the Colorado Research Network (CaReNet). Both CaReNet and HPRN are practice based research networks (PBRNs) affiliated with the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Colorado.

Project Aims (Overview):

We will combine three different proven research approaches to develop and study a community-based intervention to improve CRC screening rates.

\- Component 1: Intervention Planning:

* Using a community-based participatory research model, the Joint Planning Committee (JPC) composed of members of an established Community Advisory Council for a practice-based research network and other community members, we will explore and define the messages and the delivery approaches the community members feel are most likely to result in actual behavioral change.

* Component 2: Assessment of Intervention Effectiveness:
* Using a random digit dialing telephone survey, pre and post provider/patient card study and a provider survey, we will assess the impact of the intervention.

* Component 3: Evaluation of Intervention Process and Implementation:
* Using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework12, we will guide our evaluation of both the community-based participatory research process and the effects of the intervention developed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

screening community health education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lifestyle counseling

Behavioral: small media, group education (multicomponent)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

small media, group education (multicomponent)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

small media, group education (multicomponent)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Colorectal cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John M. Westfall, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRC SIP 20-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDC-NCCDPHP-4547

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id