Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
NCT ID: NCT01920607
Last Updated: 2017-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
71 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pelvipower for Faecal Incontinence
NCT05900726
Treatment of Fecal Incontinence by Injection of Autologous Muscle Fibers Into the Anal Sphincter
NCT01949922
Optimising Treatments for Faecal Incontinence
NCT04273009
Clinical Investigation to Assess a New Artificial Urinary Sphincter to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Women
NCT05828979
Controlling Faecal Incontinence With a Novel Anal Device: a Cost-effectiveness Trial
NCT04657588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sacral nerve stimulation is currently the standard surgical treatment for severe anal incontinence when sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty) is not recommended.
A new method of treatment based on sphincter reinforcement through the implanting of a band of magnetic beads\*, has proved to be reliable and efficient on a small series of cases, particularly after the failure of sacral nerve stimulation.
The aim of our trial, which compares the "magnetic anal sphincter\* and sacral nerve stimulation" in a homogeneous population of patients affected by severe anal incontinence is to define the position of this new approach in the treatment algorithm of this functional disorder, determining its clinical and medical/economic advantages compared to those of the current standard treatment.
\* FenixTM (Torax Medical)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NMS
Implantation under general of local anesthesia of sacral nerve stimulation system (Interstim Therapy)
sacral nerve stimulation
SAM
Implantation under general anesthesia of magnetic anal sphincter (Fenix)
magnetic anal sphincter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
magnetic anal sphincter
sacral nerve stimulation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)\*.
* Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment)
* With functional anal sphincter\*\*
* Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form
* Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year
* Covered by National Insurance
* Defined as follows: at least one involuntary passing of stool per week measured by collecting data on incontinence accidents on a 3-week stool record chart, with the continence problem developing over more than 6 months. \*\*Defined as follows: external sphincter intact (without injury or after sphincter repair) or external sphincter altered, with an injury of a size that does not justify sphincter repair.
Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus).
Exclusion Criteria
* Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area)
* Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus
* Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders
* Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum
* Extensive sphincter degeneration
* Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease)
* Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia)
* Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions
* Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium
* Active pelvic infection
* Contraindications to SNS:
* Cardiac stimulator or defibrillator implant
* Malformation of the sacrum
* Patient exposed to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
* Skin diseases exposing the patient to the risk of infection (at the investigator's discretion)
* Patient scheduled for diathermy or ablation by radiofrequency
* Pregnant women
* Adults under guardianship
* Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation
* Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Lehur PA. Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02995.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC13_0209
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.