Safety, Efficacy and Quality of Life of Sphinkeeper Implantation for Fecal Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT06958497

Last Updated: 2025-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

211 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluated a treatment called Sphinkeeper™ implantation for people suffering from fecal incontinence, a condition where individuals are unable to control their bowel movements. The procedure involves placing small expandable devices into the anal sphincter area to help improve muscle function and prevent leakage.

Researchers from several European hospitals followed 111 patients over three years to assess how safe and effective this treatment is, and how it affects quality of life. Most patients had not improved with other treatments like diet, medications, or pelvic floor therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fecal Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sphinkeeper™

The procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia, with the patients in lithotomy position. Ten 2-mm perianal skin incisions were made 1-2 cm from the anal margin (i.e., 0.5-1 cm from the intersphinteral sulcus), equidistant one each other, around the entire anal circumference, to allow implantation of 10 prostheses using a specifically designed delivery system (THD Sphinkeeeper Delivery System, THD Sp, Correggio, Italy). The introducer was placed through each skin incision in the intersphincteric space where the prostheses were delivered at a level below the puborectalis muscle. All of the steps were verified by palpation and direct vision using the Eisenhammer anal speculum. Patients were discharged on the same day and recommended to avoid any trauma or sexual practice during the first 48 hours after implantation. A 5-day course of antibiotics was also prescribed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults diagnosed with clinical fecal incontinence (FI), defined as experiencing at least one incontinence episode per week for a duration exceeding six months.
* Refractory to all standard conservative treatments, including:

* Pharmacologic therapy
* Behavioral interventions
* Pelvic floor rehabilitation
* Endoanal ultrasonography indicating:

* Intact internal and external anal sphincters, or
* Internal, external, or combined sphincter defects involving no more than 120 degrees of the anal circumference.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of inflammatory bowel disease with anorectal involvement.
* Diagnosis of anorectal cancer.
* Evidence of perianal sepsis.
* Endoanal ultrasound detection of sphincter defects extending over more than 120 degrees of the internal or external sphincter, or both.
* Prior treatment with sacral neuromodulation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vienna University Hospital, Austria

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St Mark's Hospital Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Royal London Hospital, UK

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academy of Applied Medical and Social Sciences, Poland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luigi Marano

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04002025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.