Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training for Adult Hearing Aid Users

NCT ID: NCT01892007

Last Updated: 2020-10-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A double-blind randomised active-controlled trial aims to assess whether Cogmed (adaptive) working memory training results in improvements in untrained measures of cognition, speech perception and self-reported hearing abilities in older adults (50-74 years) with mild-moderate hearing loss who are existing hearing aid users, compared with an active placebo Cogmed (non-adaptive) control. It is hypothesised that improvements on trained Cogmed tasks, representing increased working memory capacity, will result in improved performance on cognitive and speech perception tasks that engage working memory. We also measure self-reported hearing ability to assess self-perceived benefit of Cogmed training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One in ten people aged between 55-74 years have a significant hearing impairment in their better hearing ear (as defined by audiometric hearing thresholds). Yet, it is becoming increasingly clear that the challenges faced by older listeners cannot be explained by the audiogram. The ability for people with hearing loss to use cognition to support context allows for compensation of degraded auditory input, which in turn offers promise for new cognitive-based rehabilitative interventions. Working memory is known to be highly associated with language and recent evidence has shown significant generalisation of on-task learning from Cogmed working memory training to improvements in sentence-repetition skills of children with severe to profound hearing loss and use cochlear implants. This evidence offers support for further investigation into the potential benefits of working memory training to improve speech perception abilities in other hearing impaired populations. This study aims to assess whether Cogmed (adaptive) working memory training improves the listening abilities of adults with mild to moderate hearing loss as assessed using untrained measurers of cognition, speech perception and self-reported hearing ability, compared with an active control (Cogmed, non-adaptive) group. A 6 month follow-up will assess retention of any training-related improvements in outcomes for the adaptive training group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Blinding

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cogmed RM (adaptive)

Online training intervention: An adaptive version of Cogmed RM working memory training. Task difficulty (number of to-be-remembered items) increases based on individual performance, in order to maintain average daily performance levels of approximately 60% of trials correct. Participants complete 35-45 minutes of active training per day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cogmed RM - Online adaptive working memory training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Cogmed RM (non-adaptive, placebo)

Online training intervention: A non-adaptive placebo version of Cogmed RM working memory training. Tasks are fixed at a low-difficulty practice level (three to-be-remembered items) and do not increase in difficulty over the course of the intervention. Participants complete 35-45 minutes of active placebo training per day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Cogmed RM - Online non-adaptive (placebo) working memory training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cogmed RM - Online adaptive working memory training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Cogmed RM - Online non-adaptive (placebo) working memory training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Existing (3+ months) hearing aid(s) user
* Mild to moderate (PTA0.25-4k Hz 21-69 dB HL) sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in the better hearing ear (SNHL defined as air-bone gap across 0.5k, 1k \& 2k Hz \< 15 dB)
* Internet access at home

Exclusion Criteria

* Participation in a previous training intervention study
* First language other than English (all speech outcome measure are presented in English)
* Unable to use either a desktop or laptop computer (Cogmed RM working memory training is delivered via the internet using a desktop or laptop computer)
* Cognitive impairment as defined as a score of less than 26/30 (fail) on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Helen Henshaw, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham.

Melanie Ferguson, BSc (Hons)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

QMC Ropewalk House

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Henshaw H, Heinrich A, Tittle A, Ferguson M. Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial. Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):741-763. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001096.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34524150 (View on PubMed)

Henshaw H, Ferguson MA. Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:417. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-417.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24304745 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08ET002-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hearing and Cognition in Aging Adults
NCT06183450 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Cognitive Screening of Patients with Hearing Loss
NCT04672174 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA