Mediators and Moderators of Auditory Training

NCT ID: NCT06812273

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-06

Study Completion Date

2027-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how Auditory Training (AT) may help people better understand speech in noisy environments. As people get older, it becomes harder for them to hear speech clearly when there is background noise. This can be frustrating, and it can affect their independence and quality of life. AT is often used to support people with and without hearing loss, especially when a person is not a good candidate for a hearing aid or when amplification from a hearing aid does not improve performance.

The investigators want to gather reliable data to understand how AT works and what affects its success.

The main questions the trial aims to answer are:

* How do different types of sounds influence the effectiveness of auditory training?
* Which auditory training approaches are most successful in improving speech understanding?
* How do personal traits impact the results of auditory training?

The investigators will study a large and diverse group of 1,260 participants, including both young and older adults, to evaluate various auditory training approaches.

You will:

* Take part in auditory training sessions that include different types of auditory tasks.
* Complete tests that measure how well they understand speech in both quiet and noisy settings.
* Complete surveys on personal data like demographics, hearing challenges and other factors to help researchers understand what might influence training results.

The investigators will measure and compare the results of these approaches to find out which ones are most effective. This could help people who are at risk of cognitive decline, like those at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Handicap

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

STM Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

STM Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This condition consists of an up/down spectral-temporal modulations (STM) presented both in quiet and with competing background noise

Speech Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Speech Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will train on the identification of three sets of speech stimuli of increasing linguistic complexity: individual phonemes (vowels), spondaic words, and matrix sentences.

Mixed Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mixed Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This condition involves both the STM and the speech training, described above, and an additional module training localization.

Gamified Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gamified Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This uses auditory training within a game experience where players control a game avatar (the "wisp") that appears to fly through a landscape. Players were asked to help the wisp avoid obstacles or choose from among options based on a variety of sound cues.

Foraging Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Foraging Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This adds a component to the game where participants navigate the wisp to the location on the screen that relates to the target stimulus. The concept here is that searching for targets with manual movements, ecologically stimulates sensori-motor loops where the actions of the participants generates the auditory stimuli that are heard.

Business As Usual

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

STM Training

This condition consists of an up/down spectral-temporal modulations (STM) presented both in quiet and with competing background noise

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Speech Training

Participants will train on the identification of three sets of speech stimuli of increasing linguistic complexity: individual phonemes (vowels), spondaic words, and matrix sentences.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mixed Training

This condition involves both the STM and the speech training, described above, and an additional module training localization.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Gamified Training

This uses auditory training within a game experience where players control a game avatar (the "wisp") that appears to fly through a landscape. Players were asked to help the wisp avoid obstacles or choose from among options based on a variety of sound cues.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Foraging Training

This adds a component to the game where participants navigate the wisp to the location on the screen that relates to the target stimulus. The concept here is that searching for targets with manual movements, ecologically stimulates sensori-motor loops where the actions of the participants generates the auditory stimuli that are heard.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-30 and 60-85 years of age.
* No self-reported auditory difficulties and normal or near-normal hearing sensitivity as measured by SRTs.
* Older adults aged 50-85 should have no more than typical hearing loss for their age and no evidence of dementia.
* Fluent in English and/or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormal vision or hearing prohibitive of training
* History of seizures, focal brain lesion, or head injury with loss of consciousness
* Physical handicap (motor or perceptual) that would impede training procedures
* Medical illness requiring treatment during the study timeline
* Social, educational or economic hardship prohibitive to training schedule
* Concurrent enrollment in other cognitive training studies
* History of major psychiatric illness, including psychosis, bipolar disorder, depression, alcohol or substance abuse, recent bereavement
* Plans to travel out of the area for more than 1 week during the intervention period
* Residence too far from the testing site, which would prevent attending the testing sessions (\> 60 miles)
* Not being proficient enough in English or Spanish that would prevent following and understanding all instructions and completing all testing sessions


* Diagnosis of dementia or other neurological disease, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
* Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (t-MoCA) score of 16 or less or Montreal Cognitive AssessmentMoCA) score of 20 or less
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Riverside

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northeastern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aaron Seitz

Professor of Psychology, Game Design, and Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Services

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aaron Seitz, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northeastern University

Tess Koerner, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Riverside

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Northeastern University

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Audrey Carrillo, M.A.

Role: CONTACT

626-482-8091

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Audrey Carrillo

Role: primary

Audrey Carrillo, M.A.

Role: primary

Lauren Charney

Role: primary

503-494-5375

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22066

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.