Introducing a Single IV Abatacept Treatment in RA Patients Currently Receiving Weekly SC Abatacept to Simulate a Holiday
NCT ID: NCT01846975
Last Updated: 2015-03-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
49 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase IIIB Switching From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Study
NCT00663702
Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study With ABT-122 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed the Preceding M12-963 Study
NCT02433340
Efficacy and Safety Study of Abatacept Subcutaneous Plus Methotrexate in Inducing Remission in Adults With Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01142726
Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients
NCT00124449
Study to Characterize the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of SC Abatacept 125 mg Using the BD Autoinjector or the Prefilled Syringe
NCT01890473
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
RA is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease. With the introduction of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (biologics), the options for the treatment of RA have dramatically changed. Abatacept is currently the only biologic to be available in both, a subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) formulation. The efficacy and safety profile of IV-Abatacept has been well established in the last years and clinical trials comparing SC-Abatacept with IV-Abatacept have clearly demonstrated an equal efficacy and safety profile. Importantly, switching from IV- to SC-Abatacept appears to be associated with a persisting good efficacy of Abatacept and no increase of adverse events (AE). On the other hand, however, switching from SC- to IV-Abatacept has not been the subject of clinical trials.
This Phase IV study is aimed at reviewing both the transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break. Holiday seasons can present a major problem to RA patients treated with weekly subcutaneous biologics, including SC-Abatacept. Therefore an evaluation into the use of IV-Abatacept treatment to cover a 4 week break may present an acceptable treatment alternative for this patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Switch from SC to IV Abatacept and back
Transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break.
IV Abatacept
Transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IV Abatacept
Transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to give informed consent
3. Patients classified as RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria (Aletaha D et al, 2010)
4. Patient treated with weekly SC-Abatacept for at least 3 months prior to study screening
5. Effective control of disease activity as defined by DAS-28 (ESR) \< 3.2 (LDAS)
6. Available for the whole duration of the study
7. Female subjects of childbearing potential must use maximally effective birth control during the period of therapy, must be willing to use contraception for the duration of the study (up to 168 days post the IV infusion of Abatacept). They also must have a negative pregnancy test upon entry into the study. Otherwise, female subjects must be postmenopausal (no menstrual period for a minimum of 12 months) or surgically sterile.
8. Male subjects must be surgically sterile or willing to use a double barrier contraception method upon enrolment, for the duration of the study (up to 168 days post the IV infusion of Abatacept)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant or breastfeeding women or such with a child-bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period (up to Day 168/Safety follow-up visit)
3. Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system, with the exception of rheumatoid nodules
4. Subjects with current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, or cerebral disease, whether or not related to RA and which, in the opinion of the investigator, might place a subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study
5. Subjects with a history of cancer in the last 5 years, or with a current screening suspicious for cancer, other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection or carcinoma in situ
6. Subjects with evidence of active or latent bacterial (e.g. tuberculosis) or viral infections (e.g. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) at the time of potential enrolment
7. Subjects with herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) that resolved less than 2 months before the informed consent document was signed
8. Subjects who have received any live vaccines within 3 months of the anticipated first dose of study medication
9. Having participated in another drug or an interventional study within 30 days preceding the present study screening
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
INDUSTRY
Rüdiger B. Müller
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rüdiger B. Müller
Oberarzt mbF
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruediger B Mueller, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Johannes von Kempis, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Genovese MC, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Porawska W, Box J, Legerton C 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Aranda R, Pappu R, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous abatacept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):2854-64. doi: 10.1002/art.30463.
Kaine J, Gladstein G, Strusberg I, Robles M, Louw I, Gujrathi S, Pappu R, Delaet I, Pans M, Ludivico C. Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jan;71(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200344. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
Keystone EC, Kremer JM, Russell A, Box J, Abud-Mendoza C, Elizondo MG, Luo A, Aranda R, Delaet I, Swanink R, Gujrathi S, Luggen M. Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb ATTUNE study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):857-61. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200355. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Mueller RB, Gengenbacher M, Richter S, Dudler J, Moller B, von Kempis J. Change from subcutaneous to intravenous abatacept and back in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as simulation of a vacation: a prospective phase IV, open-label trial (A-BREAK). Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 14;18:88. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0985-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A-BREAK
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.