Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients

NCT ID: NCT00124449

Last Updated: 2015-04-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-02-28

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

solution, intravenous injection, monthly, 169 days

weight based:

\<60 kg = 500 mg

60 to 100 kg = 750 mg

\>100 kg = 1 g

2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

solution, intravenous injection, 0 mg, monthly, 169 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept

solution, intravenous injection, monthly, 169 days

weight based:

\<60 kg = 500 mg

60 to 100 kg = 750 mg

\>100 kg = 1 g

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

solution, intravenous injection, 0 mg, monthly, 169 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Orencia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis
* Clinical synovitis of two or more joints
* At least one but not more than three of the criteria for diagnosis of RA (1987).
* No prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics.
* Duration of disease must be 18 months or less.
* Positive for antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy.
* Active vasculitis of a major organ system.
* Severe or recurrent bacterial infection.
* History of cancer in the last five years except certain skin cancers.
* Herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Shenton Park, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Morelia, Michioacan, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Leeds, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium France Germany Italy Mexico Puerto Rico Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, Legerton CW, Becker JC, Vratsanos G, Genant HK, Peterfy C, Mitra P, Overfield S, Qi K, Westhovens R. Impact of T-cell costimulation modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis or very early rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and imaging study of abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):510-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119016. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19933744 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Head-to-Head
NCT00929864 COMPLETED PHASE3
Phase IIIB Subcutaneous Missed Dose Study
NCT00533897 COMPLETED PHASE3