Abatacept With Methotrexate- Phase IIB

NCT ID: NCT00162266

Last Updated: 2012-06-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

524 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of Abatacept combined with Methotrexate in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The secondary objectives were to assess efficacy, pharmacodynamic marker activity, and immunogenicity of Abatacept combined with Methotrexate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All participants who completed the 12-month double-blind study period were eligible to continue in the open-label study. Participants received placebo, Abatacept 2 mg/kg, or Abatacept 10 mg/kg in the double-blind study. Participants receiving placebo in the double-blind study were switched 1:1 to continued treatment with placebo or Abatacept 2 mg/kg. Participants receiving Abatacept 2 mg/kg or Abatacept 10 mg/kg continued at the double-blind study dosage. After results from the double-blind period became available, all participants were switched to a weight-tiered 10 mg/kg dose of Abatacept.

Open label study design: Single group assignment, Single arm, Open label,

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abatacept (10 mg/Kg) - Open Label

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

Intervention Type DRUG

IV, 10 mg/Kg, monthly, for the duration of the trial

Abatacept (2 mg/kg) - Double blind

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 2 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Abatacept (10 mg/kg) - Double blind

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 10 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Placebo - Double blind

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 0 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

IV, 10 mg/Kg, monthly, for the duration of the trial

Intervention Type DRUG

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 2 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Abatacept (BMS-188667)

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 10 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intravenous (IV) infusion, 0 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Double blind study phase:

1. Males or females (not nursing and not pregnant), at least 18 years of age. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are eligible if they are practicing effective contraceptive measures
2. Subjects must meet the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association (1987) for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and the American College of Rheumatology (1991) functional classes I, II, or III
3. Subjects have been taking Methotrexate (10-30 mg weekly) for at least 6 months, and at a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment
4. Washout/drug stabilization requirements (except Methotrexate) \[Informed consent must be signed before making any changes in RA therapy if those changes are solely for the purpose of this study\].

* Leflunomide or Infliximab have already been discontinued at least 60 days prior to enrollment (prior to signing of informed consent) and a total of 90 days prior to treatment. All other Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) (except Methotrexate) have been withdrawn at least 28 days prior to treatment
* Oral corticosteroid treatment has been reduced to the equivalent of 10 mg or less prednisone daily and stabilized for at least 28 days prior to enrollment
5. Eligibility of subjects for the study is based on their disease activity and anti-rheumatic treatment at the initial visit:

* Methotrexate monotherapy: Subject is receiving only Methotrexate, steroids, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and will not require washout
* Combination therapy: Subject is receiving Methotrexate in combination with another DMARD(s) and will require washout

At entry, Methotrexate monotherapy must have a disease activity:
* 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count)
* 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count)
* C reactive protein (CRP) ≥.1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) at "Screening" visit

At entry, combination therapy must have a disease activity (if subject does not satisfy the above):
* 6 or more swollen joints (66 joint count)
* 8 or more tender joints (68 joint count)
* No restriction on C-reactive protein (CRP)

In addition

All subjects who were on combination therapy at entry must undergo a 28 day washout period of DMARDs other than Methotrexate. After the washout/drug stabilization and prior to randomization such subjects must have:
* 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count)
* 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count)
* C reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1 mg/dL (10 mg/L)
6. Subject is willing to participate in the study and willing to sign the informed consent

Open label study phase:

* Participants that have completed the initial short term portion (double blind) of the study

Exclusion Criteria

Double blind study phase:

1. Subjects who have at any time received treatment with BMS-188667 (Abatacept)
2. Subjects who within 30 days of the Day 1 visit have received treatment with any investigational drug
3. Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system (except for subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules)
4. Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease. Concomitant medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study
5. Mammogram requiring further investigation or biopsies leading to the diagnosis of a clinically significant abnormality. Complete evaluation of lesion is required before initiation of dosing
6. Subjects with a history of cancer within the last five years (other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection)
7. Subjects who have a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse, or admit to consumption of more than 1 alcoholic drink per day
8. Subjects with evidence (as assessed by the investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment, including subjects with evidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, or hepatitis B or C infection
9. Subjects with any serious or chronic infections such as pneumonia, pyelo-nephritis, renal infection, chest infection with bronchiectasis, or sinusitis in the previous 3 months
10. Subjects with active tuberculosis requiring treatment within the previous 3 years
11. Subjects with any opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) within the previous 2 months
12. Subjects with severe asthma defined as \> 3 emergency room admissions in the last year or \> 3 treatments with oral steroids for asthma in the last year
13. A history of either angioedema or anaphylaxis that was associated with a reaction to a drug
14. Subjects with the following laboratory values:

* Hemoglobin \< 8.5 g/dL
* White blood cells \< 3000/mm3
* Platelets \< 100,000/mm3
* Serum creatinine \> 2 times upper limit of normal
* Serum Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) \> 2 times upper limit of normal
* Any other lab values that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study

Open label study phase:
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Highlands Ranch, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Titusville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rome, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aries, Buenos Aries, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Quilmes, Burenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

St. John's, , Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montpellier, Cedex, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Strasbourg, Cedex, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Cork, Cork, Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Muckleneuk, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Canada France Germany Ireland Netherlands South Africa United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Westhovens R, Kremer JM, Emery P, Russell AS, Alten R, Barre E, Dougados M. Long-term safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a 7-year extended study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):553-62. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25005467 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-100

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Head-to-Head
NCT00929864 COMPLETED PHASE3
Methotrexate-Inadequate Response Study
NCT00559585 COMPLETED PHASE3