Abatacept Post-marketing Clinical Study in Japan

NCT ID: NCT01758198

Last Updated: 2017-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

405 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-11

Study Completion Date

2016-12-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy including joint damage progression and safety of Abatacept plus Methotrexate (MTX) to placebo plus MTX.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: Abatacept + Methotrexate (MTX)

Abatacept 10 mg/kg solution intravenous (IV) infusion, once monthly for 12 months

Methotrexate ≥6 mg/week for 12 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abatacept

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 2: Placebo matching with Abatacept + Methotrexate

Placebo matching with Abatacept 0 mg/kg solution, intravenous (IV) infusion once monthly for 12 months

Methotrexate ≥6 mg/week for 12 months

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo matching with Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo matching with Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-188667 (Orencia)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* MTX inadequate responder
* Biologic Naïve
* Functional class I, II or III
* ≥6 swollen and ≥6 tender joints
* C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥2.0mg/dl or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr
* Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positive
* Have erosion

Exclusion Criteria

* Any other rheumatic disease
* Active angiitis on main organs excluding rheumatoid nodule
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kasamatsu-town, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kakogawa, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Izumisano, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Fujieda, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Asahi, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Fuchū, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Funabashi, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Hakodate, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Hitachi, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Hokkaido, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Iizuka, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kanazawa, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kasama, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Katō, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitakyushu, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitakyushu, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitakyushu, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kochi, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kōshi, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Matsumoto, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagano, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagaoka, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Narashino, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Narita, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Ōme, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Ōsaki, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sasebo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sayama, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Shizuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Takaoka, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Takasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Tomakomai, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Toyama, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Toyama, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Utsunomiya, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Local institution

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Yotsukaidō, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-338

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Head-to-Head
NCT00929864 COMPLETED PHASE3