Abatacept and Infliximab in Combination With Methotrexate in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT00095147

Last Updated: 2015-03-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

431 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if Abatacept or Infliximab in combination with Methotrexate demonstrate a greater reduction in disease activity over placebo.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX) (double-blind [DB])

Days 1-365

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX), double-blind (DB)

Intervention Type DRUG

Abatacept, intravenous (IV) Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 12 months.

Infliximab + MTX (DB)

Days 1-365

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Infliximab (INF) + MTX, DB

Intervention Type DRUG

Infliximab, IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Every 2 Months, 12 months.

Placebo + MTX (DB)

Days 1-197

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo (PLA) + MTX, DB

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo, IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months.

Placebo + MTX switched to abatacept + MTX (DB)

Participants received placebo plus methotrexate for days 1-197, and abatacept plus methotrexate for days 198-365

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PLA + MTX switched to ABA+ MTX, DB

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo=IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months. Abatacept=IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months

Abatacept (open-label)

Days 365 to 729 All participants receive Active Drug

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ABA, open-label (OL)

Intervention Type DRUG

Abatacept, IV solution, Infusion. Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 12+ months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX), double-blind (DB)

Abatacept, intravenous (IV) Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 12 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Infliximab (INF) + MTX, DB

Infliximab, IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Every 2 Months, 12 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (PLA) + MTX, DB

Placebo, IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

PLA + MTX switched to ABA+ MTX, DB

Placebo=IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months. Abatacept=IV Solution, Infusion, Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 6 months

Intervention Type DRUG

ABA, open-label (OL)

Abatacept, IV solution, Infusion. Depends on participant weight, Monthly, 12+ months

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Orencia Orencia Orencia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
* At least 3 months prior treatment with Methotrexate (MTX)
* At least 10 swollen joints and 12 tender joints and C-Reactive Protein of at least 1 mg/dl
* Washout required for other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS)

Exclusion Criteria

* participants who have failed more than 3 DMARDs
* participants previously treated with an approved biologic drug
* History of cancer in the last 5 years
* Severe or recurrent bacterial infection
* Any previous or current medical conditions that are contraindications to the use of TNF blocking agents
* Women of Child Bearing Potential
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Cotton Tree, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Kitchener, , Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio Piedras, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Muckleneuk, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Berea, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Panorama, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Canada Czechia Denmark Mexico Peru Poland Puerto Rico Russia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schiff M, Keiserman M, Codding C, Songcharoen S, Berman A, Nayiager S, Saldate C, Li T, Aranda R, Becker JC, Lin C, Cornet PL, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: a phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Aug;67(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.080002. Epub 2007 Nov 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18055472 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-043

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Methotrexate-Inadequate Response Study
NCT00559585 COMPLETED PHASE3
Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Head-to-Head
NCT00929864 COMPLETED PHASE3