Phase III Study of BMS-188667 (CTLA4Ig) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Currently Failing Anti-TNF Therapy or Who Have Failed Anti-TNF Therapy in the Past.

NCT ID: NCT00048581

Last Updated: 2011-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

738 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-12-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to determine whether abatacept treatment on a background of Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) will relieve the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in participants who are currently receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for at least 3 months and are not responding or have taken anti-TNF therapy in the last 3 months and did not respond. The safety of treatment with abatacept will also be evaluated. This study also has a 4.5-year long-term extension beginning 6 months after the start of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abatacept

Short Term Portion of Study

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Vials, intravenous (IV), \~10mg/kg abatacept, One every 2 weeks for first month then every 4 weeks thereafter, 6 months.

Placebo

Short Term Portion of Study

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Vials, IV, 0mg, One every 2 weeks for first month then every 4 weeks thereafter, 6 months.

Abatacept (Long Term)

Long Term Portion of Study:

All participants receive Active Drug

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Vials, IV, \~10mg/kg abatacept, every 4 weeks, 5.5 years

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept

Vials, intravenous (IV), \~10mg/kg abatacept, One every 2 weeks for first month then every 4 weeks thereafter, 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Vials, IV, 0mg, One every 2 weeks for first month then every 4 weeks thereafter, 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Abatacept

Vials, IV, \~10mg/kg abatacept, every 4 weeks, 5.5 years

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Orencia BMS-188667 CTLA4Ig Orencia BMS-188667 CTLA4Ig

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
* Current symptoms of serious medical disease
* History of cancer in last 5 years other than non-melanoma skin cancer
* Chronic serious infection
* Active TB requiring treatment in last 5 years
* Herpes zoster in last 2 months
* Any active viral infection including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
* Serious side effects associated with previous anti-TNF therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamden, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rome, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hassett AL, Li T, Buyske S, Savage SV, Gignac MA. The multi-faceted assessment of independence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary validation from the ATTAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1443-53. doi: 10.1185/030079908x297376. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18402714 (View on PubMed)

Stewart AL and Ware JE. Measuring function and well being. The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1992.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Spritzer KL, Hays RD. (2003, November). MOS Sleep Scale: A Manual For Use and Scoring, Version 1.0. Los Angeles, CA.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Alten R, Burkhardt H, Feist E, Kruger K, Rech J, Rubbert-Roth A, Voll RE, Elbez Y, Rauch C. Abatacept used in combination with non-methotrexate disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a descriptive analysis of data from interventional trials and the real-world setting. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1488-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29329602 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id