Patient-Reported Efficacy of Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) - South Africa

NCT ID: NCT02598466

Last Updated: 2016-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research question: what are the patterns of patient-reported changes in physical function among adult patients using SC abatacept with moderate to severe RA since commencement of the compassionate use program (CUP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abatacept

Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abatacept

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

* The global clinical trials and associated long-term extension phases imposed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only patients that completed the clinical trials and the long-term extension phase were eligible for inclusion in the CUP
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hexor, South Africa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IM101-572

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Head-to-Head
NCT00929864 COMPLETED PHASE3
Phase IIIB Subcutaneous Missed Dose Study
NCT00533897 COMPLETED PHASE3
Methotrexate-Inadequate Response Study
NCT00559585 COMPLETED PHASE3
Abatacept With Methotrexate- Phase IIB
NCT00162266 COMPLETED PHASE2