The Impact of Emergency Physician Empathy on Litigation Propensity

NCT ID: NCT01837706

Last Updated: 2014-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

437 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to observe whether people would report being less likely to sue a physician who shows more empathy when giving a patient potentially bad news regarding their medical condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators hypothesized that patients will have less propensity to sue emergency physicians after a poor outcome if the physician demonstrated empathy by verbalizing that they recognize the patient is concerned about their symptoms, and that the patient knows their typical state of health better than a physician seeing them for the first time. Accordingly, the investigators will assess whether the presence or absence of emergency physician empathetic statements in videotaped simulated encounters will alter patient propensity towards litigation. Secondary objectives are to assess whether the presence or absence of empathetic statements alters patient perceptions of discharge instruction clarity, physician expertness, physician caring, and physician desirability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Empathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emergency Room Patients

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Emergency Room Patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speaking
* Not healthy enough to be in waiting room
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dustin Smith

Faculty

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dustin Smith, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University

Ellen Reibling, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Loma Linda University

Jesse Kellar, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Loma Linda University

Steve Green, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Loma Linda University

Elizabeth Walters, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Loma Linda University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Emergency Department

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smith DD, Kellar J, Walters EL, Reibling ET, Phan T, Green SM. Does emergency physician empathy reduce thoughts of litigation? A randomised trial. Emerg Med J. 2016 Aug;33(8):548-52. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205312. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27002161 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RS-5120206

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Text Messaging Follow-up From ED
NCT03370978 WITHDRAWN NA