Role of Provider-at-Triage on ED Efficiency and Quality of Care
NCT ID: NCT02703701
Last Updated: 2019-09-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
439 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hospital emergency department (ED) is often the portal of entry for patients seeking health care services and is therefore an ideal setting for initiatives to improve efficiency of care delivery and patient satisfaction. Reduction in wait times, enhanced information delivery and ED staff service quality all have a positive influence on patient perception of health care quality and satisfaction.
Prior studies have attempted to increase patient satisfaction by improving staff communication and courtesy, implementing a patient satisfaction team in triage, and delivering information to patients in a timely manner. Another strategy to increase the efficiency of ED operations is adding a physician to triage to perform brief medical screenings and initiate necessary patient testing and treatment. This contrasts to usual practice in which physicians evaluate patients only following registration and nurse assessment of illness or injury severity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standardized Comparison of Triage in EMS
NCT00468780
Text Messaging Follow-up From ED
NCT03370978
Use of a Brief Phone Call After ED Discharge
NCT01893931
A Case Management Study Targeted to Reduce Health Care Utilization for Frequent Emergency Department Visitors
NCT01985074
Targeted Letters to Reduce Avoidable Emergency Department Attendances
NCT02334189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants who decide to take part in this study, will be asked questions by research staff, who will document responses on a secure iPAD device. The survey will ask participants how they feel about their health condition, the emergency department wait, the care they received in the emergency department and how satisfied the participant was with the care received.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Group enrolled during normal emergency department operating procedures (without a physician present at triage).
Usual Care
No physician at triage
Physician at Triage
Group enrolled while a physician is present at triage.
Physician at triage
A physician embedded at triage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physician at triage
A physician embedded at triage
Usual Care
No physician at triage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* Without hemodynamic or respiratory compromise
* Do not have a nurse-assigned triage severity score of Emergency Severity Index 1 (most severe illness or injury score).
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling or unable to sign an informed consent
* In police custody
* Too ill to participate in study.
18 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brandon Allen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univeristy of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UF Health
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB201500586
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.