Pain Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT02980172

Last Updated: 2017-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

31942 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

All patients admitted in Geneva University Hospitals (GUH) emergency department (ED) are triaged using the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS), a 4-level symptom-based triage scale. At the end of the triage process the triage nurse has to choose an emergency level and a main presenting complaint among a listing of 98 presenting complaints. The SETS recommends a pain evaluation for 44 out of the SETS 98 presenting complaint.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether pain is correctly evaluated when required by the SETS criteria. The secondary objectives are (1) to evaluate whether an appropriate treatment is delivered when pain is present, and (2) to identify predictors of pain evaluation and treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients admitted in Geneva University Hospitals (GUH) emergency department (ED) are triaged using the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS), a 4-level symptom-based triage scale. At the end of the triage process the triage nurse has to choose an emergency level and a main presenting complaint among a listing of 98 presenting complaints. The SETS recommends a pain evaluation for 44 out of the SETS 98 presenting complaint.

After this evaluation, a protocol standardize administration of analgesia for patients presenting pain.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether pain is correctly evaluated when required by the SETS criteria for the 44 presenting complaints.

The secondary objectives are (1) to evaluate whether an appropriate treatment is delivered when pain is present, and (2) to identify predictors of pain evaluation and treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute Emergencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pain triage complaint

Patients admitted at GUH ED triaged with a main complaint requiring a pain evaluation.

Pain evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of pain using a numerical scale (1 to 10)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain evaluation

Evaluation of pain using a numerical scale (1 to 10)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult (\>= 16y) patients admitted at GUH ED during one year
* presenting complaint requiring pain evaluation accordingly to the SETS criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 16 y
* presenting complaint that does not require a pain evaluation accordingly to the SETS criteria
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Olivier T. Rutschmann

Professor, Deputy Chief

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier T Rutschmann, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Geneva

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geneva University Hospitals, ED

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCER 2016-00205

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.