Case Management for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT01934322

Last Updated: 2015-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a specific case management intervention for frequent users (FU) of Emergency Department (ED).

Compared to infrequent or non-users, most of the ED-FU visitors are identified as vulnerable patients because they are more likely to be of low social and economical status, be more isolated and live alone. They report more chronic medical conditions, have a higher mortality rate and consume more healthcare resources.

In the literature, interventions aimed at improving the management of ED-FU have demonstrated several positive outcomes, but there are still some knowledge gaps.

The proposed project tests the hypotheses that case management intervention as compared with standard emergency care

* is a more efficient use of healthcare resources and reduces ED attendance,
* is cost-saving and
* improves quality of life,
* altogether leading to favorable cost-utility ratio.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Frequent Users of the Emergency Department Vulnerable Populations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Case Management

Furnish specific assistance and to provide referrals for the patients:

* If the social determinants are not adequate, the team will lend assistance for obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage if eligible, stable housing, schooling for children, etc.
* If there are mental disturbances, the team will refer to mental health departments inside the hospital, and if necessary, to a psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner (GP) out in the community.
* If the patient presents risk behaviors, the team will refer to substance abuse services and links to community services in order to maintain continuity of care.
* In case of somatic problems, the team will find a new GP or make contact with the previous provider, contingent on the patient's consent.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Case Management

Intervention Type OTHER

Furnish specific assistance and to provide referrals for the patients:

* If the social determinants are not adequate, the team will lend assistance for obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage if eligible, stable housing, schooling for children, etc.
* If there are mental disturbances, the team will refer to mental health departments inside the hospital, and if necessary, to a psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner (GP) out in the community.
* If the patient presents risk behaviors, the team will refer to substance abuse services and links to community services in order to maintain continuity of care.
* In case of somatic problems, the team will find a new GP or make contact with the previous provider, contingent on the patient's consent.

Control

Patients randomized to control group (usual care) will receive standard emergency care by physicians (resident or attending physician) and nurses, without the case manager been involved. Nevertheless, the mobile team will take contact with each patient of the control group, giving them short information through a flyer (flyer) which will underline the existence of the mobile team, its addresses and telephone numbers.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Case Management

Furnish specific assistance and to provide referrals for the patients:

* If the social determinants are not adequate, the team will lend assistance for obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage if eligible, stable housing, schooling for children, etc.
* If there are mental disturbances, the team will refer to mental health departments inside the hospital, and if necessary, to a psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner (GP) out in the community.
* If the patient presents risk behaviors, the team will refer to substance abuse services and links to community services in order to maintain continuity of care.
* In case of somatic problems, the team will find a new GP or make contact with the previous provider, contingent on the patient's consent.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 5 or more attendances during the previous 12 months at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Lausanne
* Be capable of communicating in any of the languages spoken by the team (i.e. French, English, German, Italian and Spanish) or through a community interpreter

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who cannot give informed consent or are ineligible to receive Case Managers services (e.g. acutely confused, acutely psychotic, intoxicated)
* Patients who are in prison
* Patients with a diagnose of cognitive disorders (delirium, dementia, and other cognitive disorders)
* Patients who are not expected to survive at least 18 months after enrollment
* Patients who will not remain in Switzerland for 12 to 18 months after enrollment
* Family members of a participant already included
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lausanne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Patrick Bodenmann

PD, MER, MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bodenmann Patrick, PD, MER, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Lausanne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Lausanne

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Althaus F, Paroz S, Hugli O, Ghali WA, Daeppen JB, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Bodenmann P. Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):41-52.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21689565 (View on PubMed)

Bieler G, Paroz S, Faouzi M, Trueb L, Vaucher P, Althaus F, Daeppen JB, Bodenmann P. Social and medical vulnerability factors of emergency department frequent users in a universal health insurance system. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01246.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22221292 (View on PubMed)

Althaus F, Stucki S, Guyot S, Trueb L, Moschetti K, Daeppen JB, Bodenmann P. Characteristics of highly frequent users of a Swiss academic emergency department: a retrospective consecutive case series. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;20(6):413-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835e078e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23337095 (View on PubMed)

Shumway M, Boccellari A, O'Brien K, Okin RL. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18272094 (View on PubMed)

Iglesias K, Baggio S, Moschetti K, Wasserfallen JB, Hugli O, Daeppen JB, Burnand B, Bodenmann P. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1739-6. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29188481 (View on PubMed)

Bodenmann P, Velonaki VS, Ruggeri O, Hugli O, Burnand B, Wasserfallen JB, Moschetti K, Iglesias K, Baggio S, Daeppen JB. Case management for frequent users of the emergency department: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 17;14:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-264.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24938769 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FNS 30023B_135762/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Text Messaging Follow-up From ED
NCT03370978 WITHDRAWN NA