Study of the Impact of Parental Note Taking on the Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance
NCT ID: NCT01014169
Last Updated: 2012-10-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of the impact of note taking during the delivery of newborn anticipatory guidance on maternal practices related to newborn care. The investigators plan to compare a control group of mothers receiving standard of care anticipatory guidance with an intervention group of mothers who are encouraged to take written notes while receiving the anticipatory guidance. The primary outcome of interest is maternal practice related to infant sleep position, and the secondary outcomes of interest are maternal practice related to breastfeeding initiation and car seat use. The investigators also plan to evaluate the impact of note taking on mothers' knowledge of recommended practices related to newborn care and on mothers' satisfaction with the guidance received.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Note taking has been shown to improve both memory and comprehension in a number of settings. In a study of memory aids, participants taking notes exhibited higher levels of accurate recall of information than participants using other techniques \[4\]. Another study demonstrated that participants who took notes and then had the notes to review had improved recall of information when compared to participants who were given written information to study but did not take notes themselves \[5\]. Even doodling has been shown to lead to improved memory and to aid with concentration \[6\]. Interestingly, patient or family note taking for retention of medical information has not been extensively studied.
A number of studies have been done to look at interventions to improve both the delivery of health information and the retention of the information provided. Randomized controlled trials have looked at the impact of specific training programs for providers \[7\] and at practice-wide changes in office systems \[8\], and have shown improvements in the amount and quality of guidance provided. A study looking at the impact of physician advice on behavior change found that patients who had received counseling by their physician prior to receiving related written materials had better recall of information and were more likely to share the materials with others when compared to patients who only received the written material with no counseling \[9\]. A study on information recall of instructions given in the emergency department for otitis media care showed that parents retained more information at one and three days after the encounter when they received either standardized verbal or written instructions, as opposed to the usual verbal instructions \[10\].
The effective delivery of health information plays a central role in pediatric primary care. In 1990, the Federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, along with the American Academy of Pediatrics, launched Bright Futures, a set of health supervision guidelines for pediatric patients aged birth to 21 \[11\]. The guidelines, which provide a framework for well-patient care, emphasize a partnership between the healthcare team, the family, and the child and highlight a number of recommended topics to be covered at routine visits \[12\]. This is a standard curriculum for primary care in many pediatric residencies, including the Boston Combined Residency Program.
For many families, the first interaction with a healthcare provider for their child occurs during the newborn evaluation prior to discharge from the hospital. The newborn anticipatory guidance recommended by Bright Futures is divided into the five categories of family readiness, infant behaviors, feeding, safety, and routine newborn care \[12\]. Included in these topics are recommendations for counseling on prone sleeping position, or "back to sleep," breast feeding support, and car seat use, all of which have been shown to improve infant health and safety \[13,14,15\]. Despite the recommendations for newborn anticipatory guidance, a national survey of parents with young children showed that 38% of parents reported never having discussed newborn care with a healthcare provider \[16\]. The authors of the study comment that it is difficult to know whether a portion of these families received information but were unable to remember it at the time of the survey. In the same study, a perceived lack of information was correlated with decreased satisfaction with care. The parents who reported discussing fewer anticipatory guidance topics gave their providers lower overall ratings.
A survey of sleep position of infants seen at an urban primary care center in Washington DC showed that 34.1% of infants were sleeping in the recommended supine position \[17\]. A subsequent study of sleep position reported by parents of black infants at a WIC clinic in Washington DC showed that 57.7% of the infants were sleeping in the supine position \[13\]. While there are many factors that impact parental behaviors around sleep position, the most common reasons given for supine sleeping position in this study were concern for SIDS and advice from a health care professional. These findings indicate that improved delivery of anticipatory guidance may play a role in increasing the proportion of infants sleeping on their backs.
At Boston Medical Center (BMC), a group of three nurse practitioners split full-time coverage of the newborn nursery and are responsible for doing a great deal of the newborn teaching with parents. Prior to discharge from the hospital, each infant is evaluated and teaching on newborn care is done using both verbal instruction and written handouts. This teaching, which is based on the Bright Futures recommendations, covers topics including feeding, diaper care, bathing, dressing, umbilical cord care, circumcision care, safety, sleeping, and crying. The providers also review warning signs that may indicate that an infant is sick. At the time this teaching is done, each mother is given a large envelope containing the discharge documents. On the outside of the envelope is a section designated for taking notes, although this is not currently used by the providers or parents.
In our study, a randomized controlled trial, we will draw on the techniques promoted by the Suzuki method of music education to see if the principles of increased parental involvement and parental note taking can improve information retention and impact behavior change. We hypothesize that more active parental participation in the form of note taking during the delivery of anticipatory guidance will lead to increased knowledge, higher levels of satisfaction with the encounter, and increased adoption of recommended parenting practices. Our specific aims are as follows:
Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of note taking during the delivery of newborn anticipatory guidance on maternal behavior. The primary outcome of interest is maternal practice related to infant sleep position, and the secondary outcomes of interest are maternal practice related to breastfeeding initiation and car seat use.
Specific Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of note taking on mothers' knowledge of recommended practices related to newborn care.
Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the impact of note taking during health information delivery on mothers' satisfaction with the guidance received.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
Mothers in the control group will receive the nursing discharge newborn information from the nurse practitioner \[sometimes via a Spanish interpreter, if required\] according to current standard of care, which includes verbal information and written handouts.
No interventions assigned to this group
Note taking
The mothers in the intervention group will be given a pen and encouraged to take written notes in the notes section of the discharge envelope using their language of preference when receiving the standard newborn information.
Note taking
The mothers in the intervention group will be given a pen and encouraged to take written notes in the notes section of a discharge envelope using their language of preference when receiving standard newborn discharge information.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Note taking
The mothers in the intervention group will be given a pen and encouraged to take written notes in the notes section of a discharge envelope using their language of preference when receiving standard newborn discharge information.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* maternal spoken fluency in either English or Spanish
* a working telephone in the home.
Exclusion Criteria
* mother not expected to retain custody of the infant at the time of discharge
15 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Joel and Barbara Alpert Endowment For The Children of The City
UNKNOWN
Boston Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
C. Jason Wang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kendall J. Suzuki's Mother Tongue Method. Music Educators Journal. 1986;72:47-50
Creech A and Hallam S. Parent-teacher-pupil interactions in instrumental music tuition: a literature review. B.J. Music Ed. 2003;20:29-44.
Grilli S. An interview with Dr. Shin'ichi Suzuki at the Talent Education Institute. International Review of Education. 1992; 38: 547-551.
Intons-Peterson MJ, Fournier J. External and Internal Memory Aids: When and How Often Do We Use Them? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1986;115:267-280.
Kiewra KA DuBois NF, McShane CD, et al. Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1991;83:240-245.
Andrade J. What Does Doodling Do? Appl Cognit Psychol.2009;23:1-7.
Gielen AC, Wilson ME, McDonald EM, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Hwang WT, Wang MC. Randomized trial of enhanced anticipatory guidance for injury prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jan;155(1):42-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.1.42.
Rosenthal MS, Lannon CM, Stuart JM, Brown L, Miller WC, Margolis PA. A randomized trial of practice-based education to improve delivery systems for anticipatory guidance. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):456-63. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.456.
Kreuter MW, Chheda SG, Bull FC. How does physician advice influence patient behavior? Evidence for a priming effect. Arch Fam Med. 2000 May;9(5):426-33. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.5.426.
Isaacman DJ, Purvis K, Gyuro J, Anderson Y, Smith D. Standardized instructions: do they improve communication of discharge information from the emergency department? Pediatrics. 1992 Jun;89(6 Pt 2):1204-8.
Green M, Kessel SS. Diagnosing and treating health: bright futures. Pediatrics. 1993 May;91(5):998-1000. No abstract available.
2008. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, Third Edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.
Moon RY, Oden RP, Grady KC. Back to Sleep: an educational intervention with women, infants, and children program clients. Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):542-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.542.
United States Preventative Services Task Force: Recommendations of Breastfeeding Counseling. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbrfd.htm. Accessed on 11/25/08.
Zaza S, Sleet DA, Thompson RS, Sosin DM, Bolen JC; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase use of child safety seats. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):31-47. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00377-4.
Schuster MA, Duan N, Regalado M, Klein DJ. Anticipatory guidance: what information do parents receive? What information do they want? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Dec;154(12):1191-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.12.1191.
Moon RY, Omron R. Determinants of infant sleep position in an urban population. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002 Oct;41(8):569-73. doi: 10.1177/000992280204100803.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-28356
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id