Safety and Effectiveness of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) Program in Surgical Patients

NCT ID: NCT01820949

Last Updated: 2015-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

110000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate clinical outcome after the step-wise implementation of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) Program in surgical patients at 4 hospitals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A PBM program will be implemented stepwise in four University Hospitals, with the intention to optimize preoperative hemoglobin concentration of patients and to standardize transfusion practice within hemotherapy. The PBM program includes 1) an algorithm with the aim to correct preoperative anemia in elective surgery, 2) a strict indication for the transfusion of red blood cells defined by the "Cross-sectional Guidelines for Therapy with Blood Components and Plasma Derivatives" for all surgical patients, and 3) a perioperative checklist for different blood-sparing techniques (e.g. cell-saver, normothermia, reduced blood samples, point-of-care diagnostics for bedside coagulation management).

Primary endpoint: Safety of the use of PBM program will be determined by comparability of the composite outcome (in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, acute renal failure, death of any cause, pneumonia and sepsis until discharge from hospital) between patients treated after implementation and patients treated before implementation (control cohort) of the PBM program.

The primary composite endpoint defined as described above will be registered electronically by analysis of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) codes. The frequency of these events will be compared between PBM and control cohort stratified by center with a one-sided Mantel-Haenszel test in a non-inferiority setting with significance level of α=2.5% and a non-inferiority margin of 1% for the incidence of the composite endpoint.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control cohort

Standard care before implementation (pre-implementation)

No interventions assigned to this group

PBM cohort

After implementation of PBM program (post-implementation)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All non- ambulant, surgical, anesthetized patients (≥18 years)
* General Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Urology, Gynecology, Otolaryngology, Neurosurgery, Crania-Maxillofacial Surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* ambulant and all non-surgical anesthetic procedures
* Surgery in the field of Dermatology or Ophthalmology
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Bonn

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Muenster

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vifor Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

B. Braun Melsungen AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

CSL Behring

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fresenius Kabi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor Kai Zacharowski, M.D., Ph.D., FRCA

Prof. Dr. Dr. Kai Zacharowski

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kai Zacharowski, MD, PhD, FRCA

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Goethe University

Patrick Meybohm, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Goethe University

Erhard Seifried, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology of the Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt

Eva Herrmann

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe University Frankfurt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Bonn

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Frankfurt

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Muenster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ellermann I, Bueckmann A, Eveslage M, Buddendick H, Latal T, Niehoff D, Geissler RG, Hempel G, Kerkhoff A, Berdel WE, Roeder N, Van Aken HK, Zarbock A, Steinbicker AU. Treating Anemia in the Preanesthesia Assessment Clinic: Results of a Retrospective Evaluation. Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1202-1210. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003583.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29944518 (View on PubMed)

Meybohm P, Herrmann E, Steinbicker AU, Wittmann M, Gruenewald M, Fischer D, Baumgarten G, Renner J, Van Aken HK, Weber CF, Mueller MM, Geisen C, Rey J, Bon D, Hintereder G, Choorapoikayil S, Oldenburg J, Brockmann C, Geissler RG, Seifried E, Zacharowski K; PBM-study Collaborators. Patient Blood Management is Associated With a Substantial Reduction of Red Blood Cell Utilization and Safe for Patient's Outcome: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study With a Noninferiority Design. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):203-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001747.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27163948 (View on PubMed)

Meybohm P, Fischer DP, Geisen C, Muller MM, Weber CF, Herrmann E, Steffen B, Seifried E, Zacharowski K; German PBM Study Core Group. Safety and effectiveness of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) program in surgical patients--the study design for a multi-centre prospective epidemiologic non-inferiority trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0576-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25927460 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12913-014-0576-3.pdf

Safety and effectiveness of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) program in surgical patients - the study design for a multi-centre prospective epidemiologic non-inferiority trial

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

380/12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Elderly Patients
NCT03369210 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3