Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-15
2017-01-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Vascular surgical patients often receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the peri-operative period
* RBC transfusion may lead to improved outcome but on the other hand the intervention may be harmful
* Danish Health and Medicines Authority recommends transfusion of RBC at hemoglobin below 5 mmol/L while local clinical guidelines recommend transfusion of RBC to maintain hemoglobin levels above 6 mmol/L
* A large randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
* A trial examining the effect of RBC transfusion on tissue oxygenation is used to test the trial-design and feasibility for a trial evaluating post-operative mortality and morbidity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plasma Transfusion in Major Vascular Surgery
NCT04514575
Frozen Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Trauma Patients
NCT01038557
Blood Products in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02068755
Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion During Symptomatic Moderate Anemia After Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01452581
Establishment of Optimal Transfusion Threshold During Spine Surgery
NCT00967109
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If the patient drops out of the trial, either at his/her own request or due to withdrawal from active therapy, the patient will be followed up in the intention-to-treat analyses.
PROTOCOL SUSPENSION
The patient can temporarily be suspended from the protocol in the following circumstances, if the clinician in charge finds indication for blood transfusions not adhering to the planned transfusion threshold:
* Uncontrollable bleeding, defined as loss of surgical hemostasis resulting in overt or imminent hemodynamic instability with insufficient tissue oxygenation and increasing lactate production OR
* Hypotension unresponsive to fluid replacement OR
* Decompensated heart failure OR
* Stroke, extremity- and intestinal ischaemia
SAMPLE SIZE With a total of 50 randomised patients, the trial is powered to
* Show difference in mean postoperative hemoglobin of 1.0 mmol/L. With a power of 95%, 5% significance and a standard deviation of 0.9 mmol/L.
* Show a difference in 2 units (600 mL) of RBC transfused based on a standard deviation of RBC transfusion volume of 717 mL, with a power of 80 % and 5% significance
* Produce a 97.5% confidence interval (CI) equal to the sample adherence prevalence plus or minus 8% when the true prevalence of adherence is hypothesized to be 90%
* Detect a difference in near infrared spectroscopy-determined tissue oxygenation (ScO2) of 6 % during surgery. With a power of 80%, 5% significance and a ScO2-standard deviation of 7%
TIME-LINE The first patient is expected to be randomized June 8th 2015, the last will be randomized March 31st 2016 and the trial database is expected to be closed ultimo June 2016. The main manuscript will be submitted shortly thereafter.
PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS
1. The Ethical Committee of Region Zealand has approved a protocol amendment of March 29th 2016 for permission of extending the trial period to the end of 2016.
2. On September 20th 2016 The Ethical Committee of Region Zealand approved a protocol amendment of September 16th 2016 for permission of extending the sample size to 58 patients and extending the trial period to June 31st 2017.
The 2nd amendment was submitted to compensate for an unexpected high rate of patients randomised postoperatively and thus to secure a sufficient sample size (n=44) for the primary outcome measure, postoperative Hb, and the secondary outcome measures NIRS and ROTEM.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low transfusion trigger
Intervention group. Low or restrictive transfusion trigger: hemoglobin \< 5 mmol/L (approx. 8 g/dl or a hematocrit of 25%) This trigger is what is recommended by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority for stable patients with chronic heart disease.
red blood cell transfusion
High transfusion trigger
Control group. High or liberal transfusion trigger: hemoglobin \< 6 mmol/L (approx. 10 g/dl or a hematocrit of 30%) This trigger reflects the practice among Danish vascular anesthesiologists and correspond to the transfusion trigger recommended by the European society for vascular surgery
red blood cell transfusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
red blood cell transfusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Hemoglobin \< 6 mmol/L
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous serious adverse reaction with blood products
* Unable to understand the benefits and risks of testing
* Previous participation in trial
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
OTHER
Research Unit, Naestved, Region Zealand, Denmark.
UNKNOWN
Naestved Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anders Møller
Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anders Møller, Resident
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Slagelse Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Slagelse Hospital
Slagelse, Region Sjælland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10:CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
Moller A, Nielsen HB, Wetterslev J, Pedersen OB, Hellemann D, Winkel P, Marcussen KV, Ramsing BGU, Mortensen A, Jakobsen JC, Shahidi S. Low vs high hemoglobin trigger for transfusion in vascular surgery: a randomized clinical feasibility trial. Blood. 2019 Jun 20;133(25):2639-2650. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-877530. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SJ-426
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.