Outcomes of Patient Blood Management in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06553833

Last Updated: 2025-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

25979 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to compare patients who underwent major surgery and who were eligible to receive different management of their red blood count, namely, allogeneic transfusions with or without patient blood management, or blood management alone. Its main questions it aims to answer are:

Which group of patients dies more frequently: Patients who receive patient blood management only, patients who receive patient blood management and transfusions where indicated, or patients who are eligible to receive transfusions only.

Among these groups: which group of patients has more complications during hospital stay? Patients will either receive patients blood management, which is the management of anemia, bleeding and coagulation problems, will receive transfusions, that is, blood from other people, or a mix of both.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

There seems to be a clear relationship between hemoglobin level and inhospital morbidity and mortality. To mitigate negative effects of lower hemoglobin levels, that is, anemia, transfusions are given when the hemoglobin level of the patient reaches a point deemed detrimental by the treating health care personnel. Patient Blood Management (PBM) adds to the armamentarium of anemia therapy, starting typically well before transfusions are given, and sometimes beyond this point. PBM utilizes medical strategies to enhance the patients own red cell mass and to alleviate the ill effects of disease and bleeding on hematopoiesis and hemostasis.

Objective:

The objectives of this study is to investigate the effects of different blood management strategies in patients undergoing major surgery, namely PBM exclusively or PBM with transfusion therapy combined, and compare them to standard transfusion therapy as regards inhospital mortality and morbidity.

Hypothesis:

It is hypothesized that participants who undergo major surgery and who were eligible to receive a combination of PBM and restrictive transfusion regime would have a lower mortality and less complications than participants receiving a liberal transfusion therapy without PBM, while participants opting to receive only PBM without transfusion support will have increased inhospital mortality and morbidity.

Setting:

The study will be performed at HELIOS Klinikum Gotha (HKG) and HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt (HKE) which are two neighboring hospitals with overlapping personnel, purchasing, IT departments and standard operating procedures. Both hospitals offer basic, advanced and specialist care to their communities. HKG offers PBM to their patients, while HKE does not.

Data sources:

Data will be sourced from the hospital information systems of HKG and HKE. Diseases are coded with the ICD-10-GM (International Code of Diseases, Version 10, Germany) and procedures using the OPS code (Procedure Key, analogous to the International Code of Procedures).

Participants:

All adults undergoing major surgery and being treated between June 01, 2008 and December 31, 2020 in HKG and HKE will be eligible for enrollment when they were treated by a specialty that both hospitals offer.

Interventions:

Study group 1: Participants in this group received full PBM measures as clinically appropriate, but were not transfused at all, no matter how low their hemoglobin dropped.

Study group 2:

Participants in this group received convenience measures of PBM and were transfused as deemed necessary in an environment where a restrictive transfusion strategy is encouraged.

Control:

The control group was treated without systematic PBM offered to patients and transfusions were the only standard of care beyond the individual transfusion trigger.

Outcome:

Primary outcome is inhospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are morbidity measures as outlined below.

Study design:

This is a dual-center, retrospective observational cohort study. Reporting of results will be performed in line with the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement extension of the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group 1: PBM only

Participants in study group 1 receive full PBM while they opted not to receive transfusions.

Patient Blood Management

Intervention Type OTHER

PBM is a strategy to manage the participants own blood. Its focus is on anemia, bleeding and coagulation management (using predominantly pharmaceutical and technological means).

Study group 2: PBM with transfusions

Participants in study group 2 receive partial PBM while they opted to receive transfusions. Transfusions are given by physicians encouraged to use a restrictive transfusion strategy. PBM is delivered to participants at a convenient time, resorting to a set of standard PBM measures rather than individualized care.

Allogeneic transfusion

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Anemia is treated by administering donor red cells, and bleeding or coagulopathy by plasma, platelets or other donor blood products.

Patient Blood Management

Intervention Type OTHER

PBM is a strategy to manage the participants own blood. Its focus is on anemia, bleeding and coagulation management (using predominantly pharmaceutical and technological means).

Control group: Transfusions only

The control group is treated in an environment where PBM is not implemented and transfusion is the standard therapy for anemia, major bleeding, thrombopenia and coagulopathy beyond the transfusion trigger.

Allogeneic transfusion

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Anemia is treated by administering donor red cells, and bleeding or coagulopathy by plasma, platelets or other donor blood products.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Allogeneic transfusion

Anemia is treated by administering donor red cells, and bleeding or coagulopathy by plasma, platelets or other donor blood products.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Patient Blood Management

PBM is a strategy to manage the participants own blood. Its focus is on anemia, bleeding and coagulation management (using predominantly pharmaceutical and technological means).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult
* undergoing major surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* treatment in a non-comparable specialty
* transfer from admitting hospital within 6 h after arrival
* requesting PBM/ transfusion-free therapy but not offered
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

HELIOS Hospital, Erfurt, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Matthias Lucas

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helios Klinik Gotha/Ohrdruf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Petra Seeber

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Petra Seeber

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HELIOS Klinikum Gotha

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helios Klinikum

Gotha, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

O-PBM3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Elderly Patients
NCT03369210 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3