The Use of Implementation Intentions to Increase the Appointment Attendance of OEF/OIF Veterans

NCT ID: NCT01649934

Last Updated: 2018-05-03

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 54 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-06-30
• Study Completion Date: 2017-12-31

Brief Summary

The purpose of the current pilot study will be to utilize implementation intentions to increase patient compliance with appointment attendance. Participants in the current study will be individuals referred for evaluation of their treatment needs. Experimental groups will create a simple induction consisting of "what/when/where" statements (implementation intentions) with the intention of increasing their rate of calling to schedule and subsequently attend appointments associated with their care. It is anticipated that participants who take an active role in their plan and utilize the implementation intention procedures will be more likely to make and attend the appointments suggested by their treating clinician. This pilot project will provide valuable initial data as to the potential effectiveness of a simple, cost-effective means of increasing appointment attendance. If successful, it could lead to cost savings and a decrease in the appointment wait time for people by increasing the utilization of available appointments.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the current pilot study will be to utilize implementation intentions to increase patient compliance with appointment attendance. It is anticipated that participants who take an active role in their plan and utilize the implementation intention procedures will be more likely to make and attend the appointments suggested by their treating clinician. Sixty participants will be recruited to participate in the research project. Participants in the current study will be individuals referred for a secondary Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) screen. This appointment serves to develop the plan of care that will be used for determination of the treatments that would be beneficial to the Veteran and as such the appointments necessary for further assessment or treatment in affiliated clinics (i.e. mental health, physical therapy, neuropsychology). Twenty participants will serve as controls who will receive treatment planning as usual. Twenty participants will receive treatment as usual but will be asked to contact the clinics directly to make their appointments. Twenty participants will be provided with a simple implementation intention induction. The simple induction will consist of the creation of "what/when/where" statements surrounding their intention to call to schedule and to attend medical appointments associated with their care. Research staff will then monitor the participants' appointment schedule daily to determine if they made the appropriate appointments and subsequently attended those appointments. Primary data for the examination will be these yes/no data points as to whether the participant successfully adhered to their initial intention to schedule the prescribed appointments. Additionally, for those who schedule the prescribed appointments, the latency in days from the time they indicated they intended to make their appointments will serve as a measure of their compliance. Across all groups, attendance at those appointments will be recorded to determine if the procedures lead to an increase in their attendance at their appointments compared to the treatment as usual group. This pilot project will provide valuable initial data as to the potential effectiveness of a simple, cost-effective means of increasing appointment attendance. If successful, it could lead to cost savings to the VA system and a decrease in the appointment wait time for Veterans by increasing the utilization of available appointments.

Conditions

Brain Injuries

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Scheduling as Usual

Participants will be subject to the current appointment scheduling procedures.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Contact Clinic

This group will be required to contact the clinic themselves to make appointments.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Contact Clinic

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be asked to sign a form indicating their need to contact the recommended clinics to make their appointments.

Implementation Intentions

This group will create Implementation Intentions to contact the clinic to make their appointments and to attend those appointments.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation Intention

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Implementation Intentions are a series of what/when/where statements that a participant will make to create automatic cues to complete a behaviorally advantageous action.

Interventions

Implementation Intention

Implementation Intentions are a series of what/when/where statements that a participant will make to create automatic cues to complete a behaviorally advantageous action.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Contact Clinic

Participants will be asked to sign a form indicating their need to contact the recommended clinics to make their appointments.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Completed appointment for secondary TBI screen
• English speaker

Exclusion Criteria

• Neurological injury leading to dementia
• In ability to consent owing to cognitive barriers
• Non-English speaker
• Unable to schedule appointments the next working day after their secondary screen

• Minimum Eligible Age: 22 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

VA Connecticut Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Joseph F Kulas, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Locations

VA Connecticut Healthcare System

West Haven, Connecticut, United States

Countries

United States

References

Sheeran P, Orbell S. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000 May;19(3):283-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.3.283.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10868773 (View on PubMed)

Collins J, Santamaria N, Clayton L. Why outpatients fail to attend their scheduled appointments: a prospective comparison of differences between attenders and non-attenders. Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):52-63. doi: 10.1071/ah030052.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15485374 (View on PubMed)

Thornton R, Ballard K. Why military personnel fail to keep medical appointments. J R Army Med Corps. 2008 Mar;154(1):26-30. doi: 10.1136/jramc-154-01-08.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19090383 (View on PubMed)

Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D, Legare F, Montori VM, Trevena L, Elwyn G. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:e256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e256.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22286508 (View on PubMed)

Guy R, Hocking J, Wand H, Stott S, Ali H, Kaldor J. How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Health Serv Res. 2012 Apr;47(2):614-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01342.x. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22091980 (View on PubMed)

O'Carroll R, Dennis M, Johnston M, Sudlow C. Improving adherence to medication in stroke survivors (IAMSS): a randomised controlled trial: study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2010 Feb 24;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20181255 (View on PubMed)

Sheeran P, Aubrey R, Kellett S. Increasing attendance for psychotherapy: implementation intentions and the self-regulation of attendance-related negative affect. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;75(6):853-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.853.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18085903 (View on PubMed)

Brown I, Sheeran P, Reuber M. Enhancing antiepileptic drug adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Dec;16(4):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.09.014. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19864187 (View on PubMed)

Milkman KL, Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10415-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103170108. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21670283 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

01634

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id