Educational Intervention for Knee Pain

NCT ID: NCT00324857

Last Updated: 2018-10-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

663 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of interventions to improve understanding of knee replacement risks, benefits, and expected outcomes among AA primary care patients, increase willingness to consider knee replacement among AA primary care patients, and increase primary care referral rates for surgical consideration for AA patients who meet the indications for knee replacement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed project represents the next phase in a trajectory of VA research designed to eliminate racial disparities in the utilization of knee joint replacement - an effective treatment option for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Numerous studies have documented the existence of marked racial disparities in the utilization of knee joint replacement in OA. African-Americans (AA) are two to five times less likely than white patients to receive knee joint replacement for lower extremity OA. Our prior work has shown that compared to white patients, AA patients expect worse outcomes from this treatment and, consequently, are less willing to consider joint replacement even when clinically indicated and recommended by a physician. Patient willingness, an attitudinal disposition modifiable with education and counseling, has emerged as a key patient-level mediator in the utilization of elective medical procedures, such as knee joint replacement.

The short-term goals of this randomized, controlled trial are to demonstrate the efficacy of interventions to improve understanding of knee joint replacement risks, benefits, and expected outcomes among AA primary care patients, increase willingness to consider knee joint replacement among AA primary care patients, and increase primary care referral rates for surgical consideration for AA patients who meet the indications for knee joint replacement. We will test a multi-faceted intervention consisting of a knee OA decision aid video developed by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making alone or in combination with individually tailored patient counseling using Motivational Interviewing versus an attention control. The long-term objective is to reduce or eliminate the racial gap in the utilization of knee joint replacement. The central hypothesis of this proposal is that the scientifically accurate, high quality patient-centered information on knee arthritis and joint replacement provided by the knee OA decision aid, alone or in combination with motivational interviewing, will improve patient understanding of knee joint replacement outcomes, increase patient willingness to consider knee joint replacement, and consequently lead to higher rates of referral for surgical consideration when clinically indicated. With increased referral rates, currently a major bottleneck in the path to joint replacement, more AA patients will receive recommendations for surgery, thus potentially reducing racial differences in the utilization of this procedure. This proposal is innovative because it is the first patient-centered evidence-based VA intervention trial to use a decision aid alone or in combination with motivational interviewing to intervene on a well-documented and marked racial disparity in joint replacement that exists within and outside the VA health care system.

Primary Specific Aims:

1. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed intervention strategies (DA alone, MI alone or a combined DA+MI)) to improve willingness to consider knee joint replacement when clinically indicated among AA primary care patients.
2. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed intervention strategies on patient expectations of knee joint replacement risks/benefits among AA primary care patients.
3. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed intervention strategies in increasing primary care referrals for surgical evaluation of AA patients with knee OA.

Secondary Specific Aim: To examine the effectiveness of the proposed intervention strategies to increase AA patient likelihood of receiving knee joint replacement within 12 months of the intervention.

A randomized, controlled factorial design will be utilized to examine the effectiveness of knee OA decision aid and/or MI compared with attention control on select key patient-centered and process of care outcomes. We will recruit approximately 600 AA primary care patients (150 at the VAPHS, 150 at the LSCDVAMC, and 300 at the PVAMC) who meet the American College of Rheumatology clinical indications for knee joint replacement and randomize them into either intervention arms or attention control. We will assess patient expectations, willingness and referral to joint replacement. We will also collect qualitative data on doctor-patient communication following the intervention or control so that we can assess (in the future) whether or not the interventions impact study outcomes through improved quality of communication. This study will provide hard evidence needed to improve quality of care for African-American VA patients who have end-stage knee OA, a major cause of disability and functional decline in VA elderly patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1/Attention Control

Subjects randomized to the attention control arm received a patient educational booklet about OA published by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. This booklet provides a brief educational program that summarizes how to live with knee OA but does not specifically mention joint replacement

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Attention control

Intervention Type OTHER

patients received a booklet.

Arm 2/Decision Aid (DA)

Decision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Decision Aid Video

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Arm 3/ Motivational Interview (MI)

Motivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motivational Interviewing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. The MI session will do the following things: 1) Assessing Readiness, Importance, and Confidence; 2) Eliciting Barriers, Concerns and Positive Motivational; 3) Summarizing Pros and Cons; 4) Assess Patient Values and Goals; 5) Provide a Menu of Options.

Arm 4/ DA and MI

Decision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Motivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MI plus Decision aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patient viewed the video and then underwent MI.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision Aid Video

The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motivational Interviewing

The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. The MI session will do the following things: 1) Assessing Readiness, Importance, and Confidence; 2) Eliciting Barriers, Concerns and Positive Motivational; 3) Summarizing Pros and Cons; 4) Assess Patient Values and Goals; 5) Provide a Menu of Options.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

MI plus Decision aid

Patient viewed the video and then underwent MI.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Attention control

patients received a booklet.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DA MI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC, AA primary care patients \> age 50 who meet clinical criteria for knee OA (i.e., chronic, frequent knee pain based on the NHANES questions, WOMAC score = 39, and radiographic evidence of knee OA with K-L grade =2) are eligible for enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have prior history of any:

* major joint replacement
* terminal illness (e.g., end-stage cancer)
* physician-diagnosed inflammatory arthritis (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disease, ankylosing spondylitis or other seronegative spondyloarthropathy)
* contra-indications to replacement surgery (e.g., lower extremity paralysis as result of stroke)
* Patients who are not willing to be randomized
* Do not have the presence of knee OA
* Do not have telephone service
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Said A. Ibrahim, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

C. Kent Kwoh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Medical Center, Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Division of General Medicine

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ibrahim SA. Racial variations in the utilization of knee and hip joint replacement: an introduction and review of the most recent literature. Curr Orthop Pract. 2010 Mar;21(2):126-131. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d08223.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21132110 (View on PubMed)

Emejuaiwe N, Jones AC, Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK. Disparities in joint replacement utilization: a quality of care issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):44-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18021506 (View on PubMed)

Ibrahim SA. Decision Aids and Elective Joint Replacement - How Knowledge Affects Utilization. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2509-2511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1703432. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28657869 (View on PubMed)

Ibrahim SA, Hanusa BH, Hannon MJ, Kresevic D, Long J, Kent Kwoh C. Willingness and access to joint replacement among African American patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled intervention. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1253-61. doi: 10.1002/art.37899.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23613362 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 05-234

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.