Value of Pulse Pressure Variations and Corrected Flow Time in Esophageal Doppler as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Position During Spinal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01646359

Last Updated: 2012-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients under mechanical ventilation, Usefulness of dynamic indices based on the heart-lung interactions for guiding volume resuscitation has been well validated. Recently, validity of pulse pressure variation (PPV) has been also reported to predict fluid responsiveness. Oesophageal Doppler (OED) allows continuous monitoring of several important hemodynamic variables. Of the OED variables, corrected flow time (FTc) has been evaluated and used as a preload index, and has been reported to predict fluid responsiveness. Prone position caused physiologic and hemodynamic changes and influenced the predictability and cut-off values of SVV and PPV for fluid responsiveness. In this prospective controlled study, the investigators evaluated the validity of PPV and FTc as predictors for fluid responsiveness in supine and prone position in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Elective Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

corrected flow time

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

1.Esophageal doppler monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

1.Esophageal doppler monitor (CARDIO Q®, DELTEX MEDICAL. Brighton, U. K.)-inserted into the esophagus and positioned approximately 35-40 cm from the teeth. The position of OED prove was confirmed by continuously measuring blood flow velocity in the descending thoracic aorta and focused to find the optimum peak velocity and waveform signal.

2. philips Intelivue MP70 monitors

Intervention Type DEVICE

2.philips Intelivue MP70 monitors (Intellivue MP70, philips medical Systems, Suresnes, France) -a radial arterial cannula was inserted and arterial pressure waveforms were monitored through Philips Intelivue MP70 monitors. In the monitor, PPVauto was displayed in real-time. It based on automatic detection algorithms, kernel smoothing, and rank-order filters.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1.Esophageal doppler monitor

1.Esophageal doppler monitor (CARDIO Q®, DELTEX MEDICAL. Brighton, U. K.)-inserted into the esophagus and positioned approximately 35-40 cm from the teeth. The position of OED prove was confirmed by continuously measuring blood flow velocity in the descending thoracic aorta and focused to find the optimum peak velocity and waveform signal.

Intervention Type DEVICE

2. philips Intelivue MP70 monitors

2.philips Intelivue MP70 monitors (Intellivue MP70, philips medical Systems, Suresnes, France) -a radial arterial cannula was inserted and arterial pressure waveforms were monitored through Philips Intelivue MP70 monitors. In the monitor, PPVauto was displayed in real-time. It based on automatic detection algorithms, kernel smoothing, and rank-order filters.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

1.CARDIO Q®, DELTEX MEDICAL. Brighton, U. K. 2.intellivue MP70, philips medical Systems, Suresnes, France

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing elective spine surgery
* age : \> 20 and \< 70, 3. Patients expecting intraoperative blood loss more than 10% of estimated blood volume

Exclusion Criteria

* arrhythmias
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2
* valvular heart disease
* left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%
* history of lung disease
* pregnancy
* foreigner
* contraindications to esophageal doppler monitoring probe insertion (i.e. oesophageal stent, carcinoma of the oesophagus or pharynx, previous oesophageal surgery, oesophageal stricture, oesophageal varices, pharyngeal pouch, intra-aortic balloon pump, coarctation of the aorta, and severe coagulopathy)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yang SY, Shim JK, Song Y, Seo SJ, Kwak YL. Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position. Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):713-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes475. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23274783 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1-2010-0046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id