Study to Assess the Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Plus Methotrexate Compared to Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Inadequately Responding to Methotrexate

NCT ID: NCT01500278

Last Updated: 2018-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

915 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is conducted to evaluate the short (12 Weeks) and long term (104 Weeks) efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol compared with Adalimumab both in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) that is not responding adequately to MTX.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (CZP + MTX)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 1 ml solution for injection CZP
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes CZP
* Concentration: 200 mg/ml CZP
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously: loading dose of CZP 400 mg at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Methotrexate (MTX)

Intervention Type DRUG

* Active substance: Methotrexate
* Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
* Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
* Route of Administration: MTX orally

Adalimumab + Methotrexate (ADA + MTX)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Adalimumab (ADA)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 0.8 ml solution for injection ADA
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes ADA
* Concentration: 40 mg/0.8 ml ADA
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously. ADA 40 mg plus an injection with Placebo (to preserve blind) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Methotrexate (MTX)

Intervention Type DRUG

* Active substance: Methotrexate
* Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
* Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
* Route of Administration: MTX orally

CZP + MTX followed by ADA + MTX

Those subjects who received Certolizumab Pegol (400 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 4 followed by 200 mg every two weeks) + Methotrexate (CZP+ MTX) at Baseline and are Non-Responders at Week 12, switch to Adalimumab (40 mg) + Methotrexate (ADA + MTX) after Week 12.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 1 ml solution for injection CZP
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes CZP
* Concentration: 200 mg/ml CZP
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously: loading dose of CZP 400 mg at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Adalimumab (ADA)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 0.8 ml solution for injection ADA
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes ADA
* Concentration: 40 mg/0.8 ml ADA
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously. ADA 40 mg plus an injection with Placebo (to preserve blind) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Methotrexate (MTX)

Intervention Type DRUG

* Active substance: Methotrexate
* Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
* Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
* Route of Administration: MTX orally

ADA + MTX followed by CZP + MTX

Those subjects who received Adalimumab (40 mg + Placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4 followed by 40 mg ADA every two weeks) + Methotrexate (ADA+ MTX) at Baseline and are Non-Responders at Week 12, switch to Certolizumab Pegol (400 mg at Weeks 12, 14, 16 followed by 200 mg every two weeks) + Methotrexate (CZP+ MTX) after Week 12.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 1 ml solution for injection CZP
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes CZP
* Concentration: 200 mg/ml CZP
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously: loading dose of CZP 400 mg at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Adalimumab (ADA)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 0.8 ml solution for injection ADA
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes ADA
* Concentration: 40 mg/0.8 ml ADA
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously. ADA 40 mg plus an injection with Placebo (to preserve blind) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Methotrexate (MTX)

Intervention Type DRUG

* Active substance: Methotrexate
* Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
* Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
* Route of Administration: MTX orally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 1 ml solution for injection CZP
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes CZP
* Concentration: 200 mg/ml CZP
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously: loading dose of CZP 400 mg at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Adalimumab (ADA)

* Active substance: an injectable volume of 0.8 ml solution for injection ADA
* Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes ADA
* Concentration: 40 mg/0.8 ml ADA
* Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously. ADA 40 mg plus an injection with Placebo (to preserve blind) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Methotrexate (MTX)

* Active substance: Methotrexate
* Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
* Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
* Route of Administration: MTX orally

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cimzia CZP Humira ADA MTX

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject must have a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Screening, as defined by the 2010 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria (Aletaha D et al, 2010)
* Subject must have a positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or a positive anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide antibody (anti-CCP) as determined by the central laboratory at Screening
* Subject must have moderate to severe RA disease at Screening and Baseline defined as:

1. Screening (all criteria required)

* ≥ 4 swollen joints (of 28 prespecified joints)
* Disease Activity Score \[Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate\] (DAS28\[ESR\]) \> 3.2
* C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentration ≥ 10 mg/L (or 1.0 mg/dL) or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (Westergren) ≥ 28 mm/hr
2. Baseline (both criteria required)

* ≥ 4 swollen joints (of 28 prespecified joints)
* Disease Activity Score \[Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate\] (DAS28\[ESR\]) \> 3.2
* Subject must have inadequately responded previously to Methotrexate (MTX)
* Subject is using MTX 15 to 25 mg/week orally or subcutaneously at Screening and has used the same MTX regimen for a minimum of 28 days prior to Baseline

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has previously received any biological Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) or has received treatment with cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, Janus Kinase, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors or investigational agents such as spleen tyrosine kinase
* Diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis
* Infected with Tuberculosis (TB) or high risk of acquiring TB infection
* Subjects with concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection
* Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections or subjects at high risk of infection
* Use of prohibited medications like nonbiological DMARDs (excluding MTX), biological DMARDs excluding study medications, experimental therapy, IA hyaluronic acid
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parexel

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

UCB Pharma SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Cares

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

141

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

214

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

159

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

152

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

147

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

161

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

217

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

149

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

144

Menifee, California, United States

Site Status

185

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

208

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

189

Van Nuys, California, United States

Site Status

148

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

220

Lewes, Delaware, United States

Site Status

142

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

216

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

162

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

209

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

145

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

202

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

134

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

178

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

137

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States

Site Status

153

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

155

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

204

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

180

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

143

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

135

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

170

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

201

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

150

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

205

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

154

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

136

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

219

Orchard Park, New York, United States

Site Status

207

Plainview, New York, United States

Site Status

167

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

140

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

184

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

164

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

132

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

190

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

210

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

187

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

203

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

133

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

160

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

138

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

151

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

131

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

146

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

213

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

166

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

212

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

139

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

181

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

165

Victoria, Texas, United States

Site Status

211

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

157

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

163

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

215

Glendale, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

6

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

5

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

2

Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

4

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

7

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

8

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

1

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

3

Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

85

Stockerau, , Austria

Site Status

22

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

18

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

35

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

21

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

29

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

34

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

46

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

179

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

168

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

176

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

183

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

172

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

174

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

177

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

206

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

175

St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

218

Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

169

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

221

Barrie, , Canada

Site Status

171

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

103

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

61

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

58

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

49

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

40

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

89

Brest, , France

Site Status

70

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

62

Lyon, , France

Site Status

72

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

90

Orléans, , France

Site Status

105

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

56

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

64

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

47

Fulda, , Germany

Site Status

17

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

31

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

37

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

63

Osnabrück, , Germany

Site Status

11

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

66

Rheine, , Germany

Site Status

48

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

71

Traunstein, , Germany

Site Status

44

Zerbst, , Germany

Site Status

94

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

95

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

13

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

42

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

68

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

100

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

43

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

33

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

23

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

51

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

20

Limerick, , Ireland

Site Status

80

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

38

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

88

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

79

Magenta, , Italy

Site Status

98

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

67

Prato, , Italy

Site Status

36

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

39

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

194

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

195

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

193

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

192

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

191

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

60

Monaco, , Monaco

Site Status

107

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

106

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

113

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

115

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

108

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

69

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

27

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

76

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

14

Ponte de Lima, , Portugal

Site Status

81

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

54

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

74

Brăila, , Romania

Site Status

24

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

25

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

28

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

32

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

57

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

12

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

96

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

26

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

16

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

52

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

30

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

83

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

82

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

65

Vigo, , Spain

Site Status

53

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

50

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

86

Ashford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

78

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

59

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

19

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

77

Poole, , United Kingdom

Site Status

55

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

73

Upton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

99

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Mexico Monaco Poland Portugal Romania Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Combe B, Curtis JR, Hall S, Haraoui B, van Vollenhoven R, Cioffi C, Ecoffet C, Gervitz L, Ionescu L, Peterson L, Fleischmann R. Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2763-2774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31651-8. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27863807 (View on PubMed)

Smolen JS, Taylor PC, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Hashimoto M, Cara C, Lauwerys B, Tilt N, Ufuktepe B, Xavier RM, Balsa A, Curtis JR, Mikuls TR, Weinblatt M. Impact of high rheumatoid factor levels on treatment outcomes with certolizumab pegol and adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Nov 1;63(11):3015-3024. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae435.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39222436 (View on PubMed)

Paul S, Marotte H, Kavanaugh A, Goupille P, Kvien TK, de Longueville M, Mulleman D, Sandborn WJ, Vande Casteele N. Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/cts.12760. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32100960 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-002067-20

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RA0077

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.